ReviewFrontiers in surgery2024
Colorectal anastomotic leakage: a narrative review of definitions, grading systems, and consequences of leaks.
Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Single-stapled versus non-single-stapled colorectal anastomosis in minimally invasive anterior resections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Techniques in coloproctology · 2026Pooled it
- Early prediction of anastomotic leakage within 24 h after minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery using postoperative inflammatory markers: development and temporal validation of a machine learning model.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Association between preoperative HALP score and anastomotic leakage following colorectal cancer resection: A retrospective cohort study.Turkish journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Anastomotic reinforcement in rectal surgery: a position statement from an expert panel of colorectal surgeons.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Programmable Hydrogels for Surgical Interface Control: Function-Based Design, DNA-Based Molecular Modules, and Translational Evaluation.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Prevention and management of anastomotic leakage after colorectal resection: evolving trends among Italian surgeons. A SICCR survey.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Emergency Surgery and the Risk of Anastomotic Leakage After Colorectal Resection with Primary Anastomosis for Benign and Malignant Disease: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Cumulative Surgeon Experience and Anastomotic Leakage After Left-Sided and Segmental Colorectal Resection with Primary Anastomosis: A Seven-Year Single-Center Retrospective Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Observational
- Trend of C-Reactive protein after colorectal surgery may increase predictive value of anastomotic leak: a prospective analysis.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- The Impact of Preoperative Nutritional Status on the Incidence of Anastomotic Leaks in Colorectal Surgery.Cureus · 2026Review
- Hypothermia and recovery outcomes before and after implementation of a multimodal perioperative temperature-management bundle in minimally invasive radical rectal cancer surgery.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Multimodal biomarker panel for early prediction of anastomotic leak after colorectal surgery: from inflammation to ischemia.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Case Report: Use of the over-the-scope clipping system in a trauma patient for a large bowel anastomotic leak.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Left internal iliac artery stenosis as a risk factor for anastomotic leakage after left-sided colorectal surgery.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Taming colonic anastomotic leakage: Wisdom from the ancient Chinese legend of Yu the Great.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Impact of Transanal Drainage Tube Placement on Anastomosis Leakage Incidence After Rectal Cancer Surgery.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Reduction in anastomotic leakage by fluorescent laparoscopic resection for ultra-low rectal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis with BMI stratification.Updates in surgery · 2025Article
- Tannin-bearing hydrogel adhesives with enhanced mechanical and adhesion strength in response to protein leakage.Biomaterials science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anastomotic leaks (ALs) are a significant and feared postoperative complication, with incidence of up to 30% despite advances in surgical techniques. With implications such as additional interventions, prolonged hospital stays, and hospital readmission, ALs have important impacts at the level of individual patients and healthcare providers, as well as healthcare systems as a whole. Challenges in developing unified definitions and grading systems for leaks have proved problematic, despite acknowledgement that colorectal AL is a critical issue in intestinal surgery with serious consequences. The aim of this study was to construct a narrative review of literature surrounding definitions and grading systems for ALs, and consequences of this postoperative complication. Methods: A literature review was conducted by examining databases including PubMed, Web of Science, OVID Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane library databases. Searches were performed with the following keywords: anastomosis, anastomotic leak, colorectal, surgery, grading system, complications, risk factors, and consequences. Publications that were retrieved underwent further assessment to ensure other relevant publications were identified and included. Results: A universally accepted definition and grading system for ALs continues to be lacking, leading to variability in reported incidence in the literature. Additional factors add to variability in estimates, including differences in the anastomotic site and institutional/individual differences in operative technique. Various groups have worked to publish guidelines for defining and grading AL, with the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer (ISGRC/ISREC) definition the current most recommended universal definition for colorectal AL. The burden of AL on patients, healthcare providers, and hospitals is well documented in evidence from leak consequences, such as increased morbidity and mortality, higher reoperation rates, and increased readmission rates, among others. Conclusions: Colorectal AL remains a significant challenge in intestinal surgery, despite medical advancements. Understanding the progress made in defining and grading leaks, as well as the range of negative outcomes that arise from AL, is crucial in improving patient care, reduce surgical mortality, and drive further advancements in earlier detection and treatment of AL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.