ArticleSAGE open medical case reports2024
Unexpected discovery of fetal bones instead of an intrauterine device: A unique gynecological case report.
Article in SAGE open medical case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This case report details an unusual and unexpected finding in a 37-year-old woman with a history of two cesarean sections, who had an intrauterine device implanted. The patient presented with symptoms of abnormal uterine bleeding and dysmenorrhea. An initial ultrasound confirmed the presence of the intrauterine device. However, a startling discovery was made during the intrauterine device removal procedure: fetal bones were found within the patient. This case underscores the importance of thorough diagnostic evaluations in gynecological practice, particularly when dealing with patients who have complex gynecological histories. Significantly, it brings to light the necessity of employing hysteroscopy for comprehensive diagnostic assessment in cases of abnormal uterine bleeding post-abortion. This approach could aid in identifying rare and unexpected findings, such as retained fetal bones, which might be missed by conventional ultrasound. The report emphasizes the need for vigilance and thoroughness in gynecological examinations and contributes to the understanding of potential complications and anomalies associated with intrauterine device usage and post-abortion care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.