Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38756296›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Family Members' Feedback on the "Quality of Death" of Adult Patients Who Died in Intensive Care Units and the Factors Affecting the Death Quality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Kazuaki Naya, Hideaki Sakuramoto, Gen Aikawa, Akira Ouchi, Shun Yoshihara, Yuma Ota, Saiko Okamoto, Ayako Fukushima, Haruyoshi Hirashima

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kazuaki NayaDepartment of Adult Nursing, Tokyo Healthcare University Wakayama Faculty of Nursing, Wakayama, JPN.
Hideaki SakuramotoDepartment of Critical Care and Disaster Nursing, Japanese Red Cross Kyushu International College of Nursing, Munakata, JPN.
Gen AikawaDepartment of Adult Health Nursing, College of Nursing, Ibaraki Christian University, Hitachi, JPN.
Akira OuchiDepartment of Adult Health Nursing, College of Nursing, Ibaraki Christian University, Hitachi, JPN.
Shun YoshiharaDepartment of Critical Care and Disaster Nursing, Japanese Red Cross Kyushu International College of Nursing, Munakata, JPN.
Yuma OtaDepartment of Fundamental Nursing, Tokyo Healthcare University Faculty of Healthcare, Shinagawa, JPN.
Saiko OkamotoDepartment of Nursing, Hitachi General Hospital, Hitachi, JPN.
Ayako FukushimaDepartment of Critical Care and Disaster Nursing, Japanese Red Cross Kyushu International College of Nursing, Munakata, JPN.
Haruyoshi HirashimaAdvanced Critical Care Center, Kurume University Hospital, Kurume, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intensive care units (ICUs) are designed for critically ill patients who often experience high mortality rates owing to the severity of their conditions. Although the primary goal is patient recovery, it is crucial to understand the quality of death in the ICU setting. Nevertheless, there is a notable lack of systematic reviews on measured death quality and its associated factors. This study aims to conduct a quantitative synthesis of evidence regarding the quality of death in the ICU and offers a comprehensive overview of the factors influencing this quality, including its relationship with the post-intensive care syndrome-family (PICS-F). A thorough search without any language restrictions across MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Igaku Chuo Zasshi databases identified relevant studies published until September 2023. We aggregated the results regarding the quality of death care for patients who died in the ICU across each measurement tool and calculated the point estimates and 95% confidence intervals. The quantitative synthesis encompassed 19 studies, wherein the Quality of Dying and Death-single item (QODD-1) was reported in 13 instances (Point estimate: 7.0, 95% CI: 6.93-7.06). Patient demographic data, including age and gender, as well as the presence or absence of invasive procedures, such as life support devices and cardiopulmonary resuscitation, along with the management of pain and physical symptoms, were found to be associated with a high quality of death. Only one study reported an association between quality of death and PICS-F scores; however, no significant association was identified. The QODD-1 scale emerged as a frequently referenced and valuable metric for evaluating the quality of death in the ICU, and factors associated with the quality of ICU death were identified. However, research gaps persist, particularly regarding the variations in the quality of ICU deaths based on cultural backgrounds and healthcare systems. This review contributes to a better understanding of the quality of death in the ICU and emphasises the need for comprehensive research in this critical healthcare domain.

Indexed as

bereaved familydeath qualityintensive care unit (icu)quality of dying and deathsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38756296
PMCPMC11098527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.