ArticleCureus2024
Breaking the Barrier: Understanding Esophageal Ruptures.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Esophageal rupture, though rare, presents as a critical medical emergency demanding swift recognition and intervention. This condition entails a breach in the integrity of the esophageal wall, leading to leakage of its contents into the mediastinum or surrounding structures. Its etiology often involves a combination of factors, including forceful vomiting, foreign body ingestion, or medical procedures like endoscopy. Timely diagnosis through imaging modalities like CT scans, contrast esophagography, or endoscopy is crucial for prompt management and favorable outcomes. Offering aggressive care in the setting of futile treatment for esophageal perforations raises several ethical, medical, and practical implications. If the prognosis is deemed futile due to factors such as extensive tissue damage, underlying comorbidities, or delayed presentation, aggressive care may only prolong suffering without meaningful improvement in outcomes. Opting for palliative measures in such cases focuses on enhancing the patient's quality of life and providing comfort rather than pursuing futile treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.