Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38756254›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

A Review on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Fracture Detection.

Aayushi Bhatnagar, Aditya L Kekatpure, Vivek R Velagala, Aashay Kekatpure

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. FDA-Cleared Artificial Intelligence Medical Devices in Orthopaedic Surgery.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Advances in Artificial Intelligence for Wrist Joint Injury Diagnosis.International journal of medical sciences · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aayushi BhatnagarMedicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Aditya L KekatpureOrthopedic Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Vivek R VelagalaMedicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Aashay KekatpureOrthopedic Surgery, Narendra Kumar Prasadrao Salve Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Nagpur, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) simulates intelligent behavior using computers with minimum human intervention. Recent advances in AI, especially deep learning, have made significant progress in perceptual operations, enabling computers to convey and comprehend complicated input more accurately. Worldwide, fractures affect people of all ages and in all regions of the planet. One of the most prevalent causes of inaccurate diagnosis and medical lawsuits is overlooked fractures on radiographs taken in the emergency room, which can range from 2% to 9%. The workforce will soon be under a great deal of strain due to the growing demand for fracture detection on multiple imaging modalities. A dearth of radiologists worsens this rise in demand as a result of a delay in hiring and a significant percentage of radiologists close to retirement. Additionally, the process of interpreting diagnostic images can sometimes be challenging and tedious. Integrating orthopedic radio-diagnosis with AI presents a promising solution to these problems. There has recently been a noticeable rise in the application of deep learning techniques, namely convolutional neural networks (CNNs), in medical imaging. In the field of orthopedic trauma, CNNs are being documented to operate at the proficiency of expert orthopedic surgeons and radiologists in the identification and categorization of fractures. CNNs can analyze vast amounts of data at a rate that surpasses that of human observations. In this review, we discuss the use of deep learning methods in fracture detection and classification, the integration of AI with various imaging modalities, and the benefits and disadvantages of integrating AI with radio-diagnostics.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceconvolutional neural networksdeep learningmachine learningnatural language processingorthopedic traumatologyradio-diagnosisrecurrent neural networks

Identifiers

PMID38756254
PMCPMC11097122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.