ArticleOpen medicine (Warsaw, Poland)2024
Endovascular thrombectomy versus intravenous thrombolysis for primary distal, medium vessel occlusion in acute ischemic stroke.
Article in Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Endovascular Therapy Versus Best Medical Treatment in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients With Distal Medium Vessel Occlusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of central nervous system disease · 2026Review
- Endovascular Therapy Versus Nonendovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke With Distal Medium Vessel Occlusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Nanotechnology for ischemic stroke treatment: addressing challenges across stroke management stages.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In the absence of clinical trials, the benefit of endovascular therapy (EVT) on the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with primary distal and medium vessel occlusions (DMVO) is still not well defined. The aim of the study is to evaluate EVT with or without intravenous thrombolysis (EVT ± IVT) in primary DMVO stroke in comparison with a control cohort treated with IVT alone. Methods: We analysed all consecutive AIS with proven primary DMVO. Primary endpoints were excellent outcome, functional independence at 3 months follow-up, and early neurologic improvement at 1 day after treatment. Results: One hundred and fourteen patients with DMVO strokes were included between 2019 and 2023. Propensity-weighted analysis showed no significant differences in EVT ± IVT vs IVT for the excellent outcome (adjusted OR [aOR], 1.575; 95% CI, 0.706-3.513), functional independence (aOR, 2.024; 95% CI, 0.845-4.848), early neurological improvement (aOR, 2.218; 95% CI, 0.937-5.247), mortality (aOR, 0.498; 95% CI, 0.177-1.406), symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (aOR, 0.493; 95% CI, 0.102-2.385), and subarachnoid haemorrhage (aOR, 0.560; 95% CI, 0.143-2.187). The type of revascularization did not influence the percentage of cerebral volume lost (adjusted linear regression estimate, -19.171, Conclusions: This study supports the hypothesis that patients with primary DMVO stroke treated with EVT (±IVT) or IVT alone have comparable outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.