ArticleDigital discovery2024
Learning peptide properties with positive examples only.
Article in Digital discovery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Attribution assignment for deep-generative sequence models enables interpretability analysis using positive-only data.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Complex Networks in Bioactive Peptide Research: A Methodological Review.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Yield Prediction of Organic Reactions in Biased Data Sets via Positive-Unlabeled Learning.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Lab to codes: multimodel advanced AI-driven pipelines to drive antimicrobial peptide design for the post-antibiotic era.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Harnessing Machine Learning Approaches for the Identification, Characterization, and Optimization of Novel Antimicrobial Peptides.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Predicting Substrate Reactivity in Oxidative Homocoupling of Phenols Using Positive and Unlabeled Machine Learning.ACS omega · 2025Article
- AI-Driven Antimicrobial Peptide Discovery: Mining and Generation.Accounts of chemical research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning can create accurate predictive models by exploiting existing large-scale experimental data, and guide the design of molecules. However, a major barrier is the requirement of both positive and negative examples in the classical supervised learning frameworks. Notably, most peptide databases come with missing information and low number of observations on negative examples, as such sequences are hard to obtain using high-throughput screening methods. To address this challenge, we solely exploit the limited known positive examples in a semi-supervised setting, and discover peptide sequences that are likely to map to certain antimicrobial properties
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.