Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38755718›Full record

ArticleZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences2024

Mouse kidney transplantation model: Three novel methods.

Zhouqi Tang, Chen Feng, Yaguang Li, Tengfang Li, Hedong Zhang, Yingqi Zeng, Longkai Peng, Xubiao Xie, Fenghua Peng, Helong Dai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zhouqi TangDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410011. tzq0510@csu.edu.cn.
Chen FengDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410011. 919325084@qq.com.
Yaguang LiDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410011.
Tengfang LiDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410011.
Hedong ZhangDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410011.
Yingqi ZengDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410011.
Longkai PengDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410011.
Xubiao XieDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410011.
Fenghua PengDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410011.
Helong DaiDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410011. helong68888@csu.edu.cn.

Funding

the National Natural Science Foundation of China 82070776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe mouse kidney transplantation model presents challenges in terms of surgical difficulty and low success rate, making it difficult to master. This study aims to provide a crucial model for transplantation immunology research by modifying and developing novel techniques for mouse kidney transplantation.

methodsA total of 57 pairs of mice were used to establish and compare the modified and innovative surgical techniques for mouse kidney transplantation. Three different surgical models were established, including the abdominal suture technique for orthotopic kidney transplantation, the abdominal cuff technique for orthotopic kidney transplantation, and the cervical cuff technique for ectopic kidney transplantation. BALB/c or C57BL/6 male mice, aged 8 to 12 weeks and weighed 20 to 25 g with specified pathogen free-grade were served as the donor mice or the recipient mice. The surgical technique characteristics, key surgical times, complications, and pathological examination in the early postoperative period were summarized and compared.

resultsThree different surgical models of mouse kidney transplantation were successfully established. The comparison of warm ischemic time for the 3 groups of mice showed no statistical significance (

conclusionsAll 3 surgical methods are able to successfully establish mouse kidney transplantation models, with no significant differences observed in the short-term graft survival and acute rejection. The modified abdominal suture technique and abdominal cuff technique have their respective advantages in research applications. The novel cervical cuff technique for ectopic kidney transplantation model is relatively simple to be prepared and causes less trauma to the mice, providing more options for studies involving xenotransplantation, secondary transplantation, and local lymphatic drainage. However, the difficulty in harvesting the donor kidney and the high incidence of ureteral infections need further validation in long-term survival. This study holds important reference value for choosing the type of mouse kidney transplantation model for different research needs.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLAnimalsMaleMiceModels, Animalcuff techniquekidney transplantationmousesuture technique

Identifiers

PMID38755718
PMCPMC11103064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.