Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38755582›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2024

Effectiveness of a needs-tailored nurse-led recovery program for community-dwelling people with schizophrenia: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Wen-I Liu, Wen-Ling Hsieh, Ching-Ting Lai, Chia-Chen Liu, Yueh-Ming Tai, Chieh-Yu Liu

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05304780 (Effectiveness of a Needs-tailored Nurse-led Recovery Program for Community-dwelling People With Schizophrenia), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05304780 nacompletednot on this map

Effectiveness of a Needs-tailored Nurse-led Recovery Program for Community-dwelling People With Schizophrenia: A Cluster-randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Taipei University of Nursing and Health SciencesRan2020 to 2021Enrolled164ConditionsSchizophrenia, Recovery, Medication AdherenceArmsneeds-tailored nurse-led recovery program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wen-I LiuSchool of Nursing, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei City, Taiwan. wenyi@ntunhs.edu.tw.
Wen-Ling HsiehSchool of Nursing, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Ching-Ting LaiSchool of Nursing, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Chia-Chen LiuTri-Service General Hospital Beitou Branch, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Yueh-Ming TaiTri-Service General Hospital Beitou Branch, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Chieh-Yu LiuDepartment of Health Care Management, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei City, Taiwan.

Funding

National Science and Technology Council MOST 108-2314-B-227-008-MY3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeeting people's needs is positively correlated with their recovery. However, recovery services rarely include nurse-led programs tailored to the needs of these people. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a new needs-tailored recovery program by using a cluster-randomized controlled trial design.

methodsWe conducted a parallel randomized controlled trial in two community psychiatric departments, employing nurse-level clustering for intervention delivery and selecting participants through convenience sampling. The participants were people diagnosed with schizophrenia that were receiving homecare services. The experimental group (n = 82) received needs-tailored recovery program for six months. The control group (n = 82) received traditional homecare. Data were collected at baseline, post-intervention, and the three-month follow-up (the study ran from February to December 2021). The outcomes were recovery, needs, hope, empowerment, psychotic symptoms, and medication adherence. We used repeated measures ANOVA tests to examine the effect of the group × time interaction.

resultsThe participants in the experimental group demonstrated statistically significant improvements in recovery, hope, and medication adherence compared to the control group, both immediately post-intervention and at the three-month follow-up. Moreover, they exhibited statistically significant reductions in needs compared to the control group at the three-month follow-up (p < .05). While the interaction effect for psychotic symptoms was not significant, the time effect was significant (p < .05). No significant interaction or time effect was observed for empowerment.

conclusionThe findings increase our understanding of recovery-oriented care that prioritizes therapeutic alliance, integrated needs assessment, individual goals, hope, and empowerment.

trial registrationThe Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT05304780 retrospectively registered on 03/31/2022.

Indexed as

Cluster-randomized controlled trialCommunity psychiatric nursesNeeds-tailoredRecoverySchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID38755582
PMCPMC11097421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.