Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38755553›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2024

Exploring how Australian general practice registrars define cultural safety with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients: a mixed method study.

Kay Brumpton, Hannah Woodall, Rebecca Evans, Henry Neill, Tarun Sen Gupta, Lawrie McArthur, Raelene Ward

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kay BrumptonGriffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, Australia. k.brumpton@griffith.edu.au.
Hannah WoodallGriffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, Australia.
Rebecca EvansJames Cook University, Townsville, Australia.
Henry NeillJames Cook University, Townsville, Australia.
Tarun Sen GuptaJames Cook University, Townsville, Australia.
Lawrie McArthurThe University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Raelene WardUniversity of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding how the general practice medical workforce defines cultural safety may help tailor education and training to better enable community-determined culturally safe practice. This project seeks to explore how Australian general practice registrars define cultural safety with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients and alignment with an Australian community derived definition of cultural safety.

methodsThis mixed method study involved a survey considering demographic details of general practice registrars, questionnaire, and semi-structured interviews to explore how general practice registrars defined cultural safety and a culturally safe consultation.

resultsTwenty-six registrars completed the survey. Sixteen registrars completed both the survey and the interview.

conclusionThis study shows amongst this small sample that there is limited alignment of general practice registrars' definitions of cultural safety with a community derived definition of cultural safety. The most frequently cited aspects of cultural safety included accessible healthcare, appropriate attitude, and awareness of differences.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAustralian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesCultural CompetencyGeneral PracticeAdultAustraliaCulturally Competent CareFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesCultural safetyDefinitionGeneral practiceIndigenousRegistrars

Identifiers

PMID38755553
PMCPMC11097438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.