ArticleBMC psychiatry2024
Identification of shared gene signatures in major depressive disorder and triple-negative breast cancer.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- NCEH1 promotes breast cancer progression by regulating NRP1 and activating the TNF-α/NF-κB signalling pathway.Cell adhesion & migration · 2026Article
- Unraveling the causal relationship and potential mechanisms between osteoarthritis and breast cancer: insights from mendelian randomization and bioinformatics analysis.Discover oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with major depressive disorder (MDD) have an increased risk of breast cancer (BC), implying that these two diseases share similar pathological mechanisms. This study aimed to identify the key pathogenic genes that lead to the occurrence of both triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and MDD.
methodsPublic datasets GSE65194 and GSE98793 were analyzed to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) shared by both datasets. A protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed using STRING and Cytoscape to identify key PPI genes using cytoHubba. Hub DEGs were obtained from the intersection of hub genes from a PPI network with genes in the disease associated modules of the Weighed Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA). Independent datasets (TCGA and GSE76826) and RT-qPCR validated hub gene expression.
resultsA total of 113 overlapping DEGs were identified between TNBC and MDD. The PPI network was constructed, and 35 hub DEGs were identified. Through WGCNA, the blue, brown, and turquoise modules were recognized as highly correlated with TNBC, while the brown, turquoise, and yellow modules were similarly correlated with MDD. Notably, G3BP1, MAF, NCEH1, and TMEM45A emerged as hub DEGs as they appeared both in modules and PPI hub DEGs. Within the GSE65194 and GSE98793 datasets, G3BP1 and MAF exhibited a significant downregulation in TNBC and MDD groups compared to the control, whereas NCEH1 and TMEM45A demonstrated a significant upregulation. These findings were further substantiated by TCGA and GSE76826, as well as through RT-qPCR validation.
conclusionsThis study identified G3BP1, MAF, NCEH1 and TMEM45A as key pathological genes in both TNBC and MDD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.