Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38755541›Full record

ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2024

Effectiveness and tolerability of eptinezumab in treating patients with migraine resistant to conventional preventive medications and CGRP (receptor) antibodies: a multicentre retrospective real-world analysis from Germany.

Armin Scheffler, Pauline Wenzel, Merle Bendig, Astrid Gendolla, Jale Basten, Christoph Kleinschnitz, Michael Nsaka, Diana Lindner, Steffen Naegel, Philipp Burow and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Armin SchefflerDepartment of Neurology and Centre for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), West German Headache Centre, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, Essen, 45147, Germany. armin.scheffler@uk-essen.de.
Pauline WenzelDepartment of Neurology and Centre for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), West German Headache Centre, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, Essen, 45147, Germany.
Merle BendigDepartment of Neurology, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Astrid GendollaPraxis Gendolla, Essen, Germany.
Jale BastenDepartment of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Christoph KleinschnitzDepartment of Neurology and Centre for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), West German Headache Centre, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, Essen, 45147, Germany.
Michael NsakaDepartment of Neurology and Centre for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), West German Headache Centre, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, Essen, 45147, Germany.
Diana LindnerDepartment of Neurology and Centre for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), West German Headache Centre, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, Essen, 45147, Germany.
Steffen NaegelDepartment of Neurology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, University Hospital Halle, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Philipp BurowDepartment of Neurology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, University Hospital Halle, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Robert FleischmannDepartment of Neurology, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Dagny HolleDepartment of Neurology and Centre for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), West German Headache Centre, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, Essen, 45147, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEptinezumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP mAb) and is used for migraine prophylaxis. Efficacy data are mainly from clinical trials, real-world data are hardly available yet. Reimbursement policy in Germany leads to eptinezumab mainly being used in patients having failed pre-treatment with other CGRP mAb. To date, it is unclear whether eptinezumab is efficacious and well tolerated in this population and how the treatment response differs from patients who are naive to CGRP mAbs.

methodsWe analysed clinical routine data of 79 patients (episodic migraine (EM): n = 19; chronic migraine (CM): n = 60) from four different centres in Germany. All patients were treated with eptinezumab (100mg). Differences in monthly headache (MHD), migraine (MMD) and acute medication days (AMD) after three months were analysed. The correlation of response with the number of CGRP mAb failures was evaluated. Significance level has been corrected (alpha = 0.017).

resultsAfter three months MHD, MMD and AMD were significantly reduced. In EM, the median reduction for MHD was 4.0 days (IQR: -6.5 to -1.0; p = 0.001), for MMD 3.0 days (IQR: -5.5 to -1.5; p < 0.001) and for AMD 2.0 days (IQR: -5.0 to -0.5; p = 0.006). In CM, median reduction of MHD was 4 days (IQR: -8.0 to 0.0; p < 0.001), 3.0 days (IQR: -6.0 to-1.0; p < 0.001) for MMD and 1.0 day (IQR: -5.0 to 0.0; p < 0.001) for AMD. All patients were resistant to conventional preventive therapies and most to CGRP mAbs. Fourteen patients had never received a CGRP mAb and 65 patients had received at least one mAb without sufficient effectiveness and/or intolerability (one: n = 20, two: n = 28, three: n = 17). There was a significant association between the number of prior therapies and the 30% MHD responder rate (none: 78.6%, one: 45.0%, two: 32.1%, three: 23.5%, p = 0.010). Regarding tolerability, 10.4% (8/77) reported mild side effects.

conclusionsThe effectiveness of eptinezumab is significantly reduced in patients who have not previously responded to other CGRP mAbs. However, limitations such as the retrospective nature of the analysis, the small sample size and the short treatment period with only the lower dose of eptinezumab must be considered when interpreting the results.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedMigraine DisordersAdultAgedCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistsFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistseptinezumabAntibody switchChronic migraineDrug resistantEpisodic migraine

Identifiers

PMID38755541
PMCPMC11097519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.