Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38755529›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2024

Multimorbidity prevalence and health outcome prediction: assessing the impact of lookback periods, disease count, and definition criteria in health administrative data at the population-based level.

Marc Simard, Elham Rahme, Marjolaine Dubé, Véronique Boiteau, Denis Talbot, Caroline Sirois

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Polypharmacy Thresholds that Best Predict Emergency Room Visits and Mortality in Older Adults: A Population-Based Study in Québec, Canada.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marc SimardInstitut national de santé publique du Québec, 945, Wolfe, 5e étage Québec, Québec, QC, G1V 5B3, Canada. marc.simard@inspq.qc.ca.
Elham RahmeThe Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Marjolaine DubéInstitut national de santé publique du Québec, 945, Wolfe, 5e étage Québec, Québec, QC, G1V 5B3, Canada.
Véronique BoiteauInstitut national de santé publique du Québec, 945, Wolfe, 5e étage Québec, Québec, QC, G1V 5B3, Canada.
Denis TalbotDepartment of social and preventive medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Caroline SiroisInstitut national de santé publique du Québec, 945, Wolfe, 5e étage Québec, Québec, QC, G1V 5B3, Canada.

Funding

Fonds de recherche du Québec - Santé Junior 2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth administrative databases play a crucial role in population-level multimorbidity surveillance. Determining the appropriate retrospective or lookback period (LP) for observing prevalent and newly diagnosed diseases in administrative data presents challenge in estimating multimorbidity prevalence and predicting health outcome. The aim of this population-based study was to assess the impact of LP on multimorbidity prevalence and health outcomes prediction across three multimorbidity definitions, three lists of diseases used for multimorbidity assessment, and six health outcomes.

methodsWe conducted a population-based study including all individuals ages > 65 years on April 1st, 2019, in Québec, Canada. We considered three lists of diseases labeled according to the number of chronic conditions it considered: (1) L60 included 60 chronic conditions from the International Classification of Diseases (ICD); (2) L20 included a core of 20 chronic conditions; and (3) L31 included 31 chronic conditions from the Charlson and Elixhauser indices. For each list, we: (1) measured multimorbidity prevalence for three multimorbidity definitions (at least two [MM2+], three [MM3+] or four (MM4+) chronic conditions); and (2) evaluated capacity (c-statistic) to predict 1-year outcomes (mortality, hospitalisation, polypharmacy, and general practitioner, specialist, or emergency department visits) using LPs ranging from 1 to 20 years.

resultsIncrease in multimorbidity prevalence decelerated after 5-10 years (e.g., MM2+, L31: LP = 1y: 14%, LP = 10y: 58%, LP = 20y: 69%). Within the 5-10 years LP range, predictive performance was better for L20 than L60 (e.g., LP = 7y, mortality, MM3+: L20 [0.798;95%CI:0.797-0.800] vs. L60 [0.779; 95%CI:0.777-0.781]) and typically better for MM3 + and MM4 + definitions (e.g., LP = 7y, mortality, L60: MM4+ [0.788;95%CI:0.786-0.790] vs. MM2+ [0.768;95%CI:0.766-0.770]).

conclusionsIn our databases, ten years of data was required for stable estimation of multimorbidity prevalence. Within that range, the L20 and multimorbidity definitions MM3 + or MM4 + reached maximal predictive performance.

Indexed as

MultimorbidityAgedAged, 80 and overChronic DiseaseDatabases, FactualFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CarePrevalenceQuebecRetrospective StudiesAdministrative DataHealth outcome predictionLookback periodMultimorbidityPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID38755529
PMCPMC11097445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.