Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38755518›Full record

SynthesisPharmacoEconomics2024

Cost-of-Illness of Skin Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Annick Meertens, Laura Van Coile, Tijs Van Iseghem, Lieve Brochez, Nick Verhaeghe, Isabelle Hoorens

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PharmacoEconomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Annick MeertensDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Ghent, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2035-6277
Laura Van CoileDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Ghent, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8072-6041
Tijs Van IseghemDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Interuniversity Centre for Health Economics Research (I-CHER), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2728-4878
Lieve BrochezDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Ghent, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6105-6719
Nick Verhaeghe *Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Interuniversity Centre for Health Economics Research (I-CHER), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9956-4970
Isabelle Hoorens *Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Ghent, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. Isabelle.hoorens@uzgent.be.ORCID 0000-0002-2513-035X

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 12Y2420NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 1S69921NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek S006123N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSkin cancer's rising incidence demands understanding of its economic impact. The current understanding is fragmented because of the various methodological approaches applied in skin cancer cost-of-illness studies.

objectiveThis study systematically reviews melanoma and keratinocyte carcinoma cost-of-illness studies to provide an overview of the applied methodological approaches and to identify the main cost drivers.

methodsThis systematic review was conducted adhering to the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from December 2022 until December 2023 using a search strategy with entry terms related to the concepts of skin cancer and cost of illness. The records were screened on the basis of the title and abstract and subsequently on full text against predetermined eligibility criteria. Articles published before 2012 were excluded. A nine-item checklist adapted for cost-of-illness studies was used to assess the methodological quality of the articles.

resultsThis review included a total of 45 studies, together evaluating more than half a million patients. The majority of the studies (n = 36) focused on melanoma skin cancer, a few (n = 3) focused on keratinocyte carcinomas, and 6 studies examined both. Direct costs were estimated in all studies, while indirect costs were only estimated in nine studies. Considerable heterogeneity was observed across studies, mainly owing to disparities in study population, methodological approaches, included cost categories, and differences in healthcare systems. In melanoma skin cancer, both direct and indirect costs increased with progressing tumor stage. In advanced stage melanoma, systemic therapy emerged as the main cost driver. In contrast, for keratinocyte carcinoma no obvious cost drivers were identified.

conclusionsA homogeneous skin cancer cost-of-illness study design would be beneficial to enhance between-studies comparability, identification of cost drivers, and support evidence-based decision-making for skin cancer.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessMelanomaSkin NeoplasmsCost-Benefit AnalysisHealth Care CostsHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.