Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38755496›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2024

Comparison of Anthropometric and Cephalometric Measurements Obtained by Stereophotogrammetry and 3D Computed Tomography of the Nose Before Septorhinoplasty.

Ali Can Aydin, Percin Karakol, Agit Sulhan, Hamdullah Erk, Mehmet Bozkurt

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ali Can AydinDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-4749-8040
Percin KarakolDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. ppercin@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0068-2139
Agit SulhanDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-5169-9948
Hamdullah ErkDepartment of Radiology, Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-1979-7502
Mehmet BozkurtDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Health Science University Bagcilar Education and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-4480-513X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionComputed tomography (CT) is normally used in evaluation of patients with esthetic and functional nasal deformities. Stereophotogrammetry (SPG) is a measurement device that is an alternative to CT and does not harm human health. In this single-center retrospective study, we aimed to evaluate measurements obtained with CT and SPG.

methodsThe measurements of 18 patients who applied to our clinic between January 2022 and August 2022 and planned for septorhinoplasty were performed on both 3D images obtained with paranasal sinus CT and SPG device (SLR type Vectra H1 system). Measurements included that dorsocolumellar length, columella-filtral length, nasal tip projection ratio (dorsocolumellar length/columella-filtral length), columella-labial angle, nasofrontal angle, tip deviation direction, tip deviation angle, tip deviation distance and dorsal nasal hump.

resultsMost of patients were male (61.1%). Mean age was 24.5 years. Only columella-labial angle measurements showed a low level of significant difference (p < 0.05). However, there was no significance difference in other measurements (p > 0.05). A significant strong correlation was observed between all Vectra and CT measurements (p = 0.000).

conclusionSPG device can be applied quickly in polyclinic without giving radiation to patient. Measurements can be taken automatically using a software. Its use in postoperative period does not carry any risk. Disadvantage of SPG is lack of information about internal nasal passage. However, there is a strong correlation between measurements obtained from both measurement devices. Therefore, SPG can be considered as an alternative to CT imaging in operation planning. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

CephalometryImaging, Three-DimensionalPhotogrammetryRhinoplastyTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdolescentAdultAnthropometryCohort StudiesEstheticsFemaleHumansMaleNasal SeptumNosePreoperative CareComputed tomographyRhinoplastyStereophotogrammetry

Identifiers

PMID38755496
PMCPMC11588960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.