ArticleCurrent microbiology2024
Humane Endpoint: Example from a Murine Model of Disseminated Sporotrichosis.
Article in Current microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systematic Review of Mammalian Models for Experimental Sporotrichosis: Pathogenesis, Methodological Variables, and Ethical Considerations.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Burrowing Behavior as Robust Parameter for Early Humane Endpoint Determination in Murine Models for Pancreatic Cancer.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vertebrate animal models are essential in research; however, efforts need to be made to decrease animal suffering as much as possible. It could be useful to determine humane endpoints that could serve as surrogates for a fatal outcome. We address this issue with respect to infectious diseases. We propose a humane endpoint for studies of Sporothrix brasiliensis infection. BALB/c mice were inoculated subcutaneously in the footpad. To define a humane endpoint, we considered two groups: animals who died during the experiment, and those euthanized at the end of the experiment. The groups were compared for colony-forming units (CFU) in internal organs, clinical condition, and body weight. Thirteen (22%) animals died before the end of the experiment due to the progression of local infection to severe and disseminated sporotrichosis. Analyzing data of the groups, we propose the following future criteria for euthanasia as a humane endpoint: neurological impairment OR necrosis of the footpad OR loss of ≥ 20% body weight AND moderate to severe dehydration. In view of the current global epidemiological impact of zoonotic sporotrichosis caused by S. brasiliensis, our data could facilitate the utility of models used to study the disease, particularly therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38755455What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.