Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38755419›Full record

ReviewWiener klinische Wochenschrift2024

Emergency critical care: closing the gap between onset of critical illness and intensive care unit admission.

Martin W Dünser, Matthias Noitz, Thomas Tschoellitsch, Markus Bruckner, Markus Brunner, Bernhard Eichler, Romana Erblich, Stephan Kalb, Marius Knöll, Johannes Szasz and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Martin W DünserDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Kepler University Hospital and Johannes Kepler University, 4020, Linz, Austria. Martin.Duenser@kepleruniklinikum.at.
Matthias NoitzDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Kepler University Hospital and Johannes Kepler University, 4020, Linz, Austria.
Thomas TschoellitschDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Kepler University Hospital and Johannes Kepler University, 4020, Linz, Austria.
Markus BrucknerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Kepler University Hospital and Johannes Kepler University, 4020, Linz, Austria.
Markus BrunnerAmbulance and Disaster Relief Services, Oberösterreichisches Rotes Kreuz, 4020, Linz, Austria.
Bernhard EichlerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Kepler University Hospital and Johannes Kepler University, 4020, Linz, Austria.
Romana ErblichDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Kepler University Hospital and Johannes Kepler University, 4020, Linz, Austria.
Stephan KalbDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Kepler University Hospital and Johannes Kepler University, 4020, Linz, Austria.
Marius KnöllDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Kepler University Hospital and Johannes Kepler University, 4020, Linz, Austria.
Johannes Szasz
Wilhelm BehringerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Vienna General Hospital, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Jens MeierDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Kepler University Hospital and Johannes Kepler University, 4020, Linz, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Critical illness is an exquisitely time-sensitive condition and follows a disease continuum, which always starts before admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), in the majority of cases even before hospital admission. Reflecting the common practice in many healthcare systems that critical care is mainly provided in the confined areas of an ICU, any delay in ICU admission of critically ill patients is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. However, if appropriate critical care interventions are provided before ICU admission, this association is not observed. Emergency critical care refers to critical care provided outside of the ICU. It encompasses the delivery of critical care interventions to and monitoring of patients at the place and time closest to the onset of critical illness as well as during transfer to the ICU. Thus, emergency critical care covers the most time-sensitive phase of critical illness and constitutes one missing link in the chain of survival of the critically ill patient. Emergency critical care is delivered whenever and wherever critical illness occurs such as in the pre-hospital setting, before and during inter-hospital transfers of critically ill patients, in the emergency department, in the operating theatres, and on hospital wards. By closing the management gap between onset of critical illness and ICU admission, emergency critical care improves patient safety and can avoid early deaths, reverse mild-to-moderate critical illness, avoid ICU admission, attenuate the severity of organ dysfunction, shorten ICU length of stay, and reduce short- and long-term mortality of critically ill patients. Future research is needed to identify effective models to implement emergency critical care systems in different healthcare systems.

Indexed as

Critical CareCritical IllnessIntensive Care UnitsPatient AdmissionAustriaEmergency Medical ServicesHumansPatient TransferCritical illnessEmergency critical careEmergency departmentMedical emergency teamPrehospital

Identifiers

PMID38755419
PMCPMC11632058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.