ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2024
A retrieval-augmented chatbot based on GPT-4 provides appropriate differential diagnosis in gastrointestinal radiology: a proof of concept study.
Article in European radiology experimental, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Fine-Tuning, Retrieval-Augmented Generation, and Hybrid Adaptation of Language Models for Clinical Decision-Making in Health Care: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Improving large language model applications in biomedicine with retrieval-augmented generation: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and clinical development guidelines.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Pooled it
- Locally deployed context-aware chatbot outperforms generic large language models for guideline-concordant pediatric imaging recommendations.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Enhancing pancreatic cancer staging with large language models: the role of retrieval-augmented generation.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Article
- Retrieval-augmented generative AI enhances clinical reasoning in odontogenic sinusitis versus maxillary sinus mucositis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- Can AI write reports like a radiologist? A blinded evaluation of large language model-generated lumbar spine MRI reports.European radiology experimental · 2026Observational
- Limitations in Chest X-Ray Interpretation by Vision-Capable Large Language Models, Gemini 1.0, Gemini 1.5 Pro, GPT-4 Turbo, and GPT-4o.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- TCM-DiffRAG: personalized syndrome differentiation reasoning method for traditional Chinese medicine based on knowledge graph and chain of thought.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Improving Large Language Model Applications in the Medical and Nursing Domains With Retrieval-Augmented Generation: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Chatbots in Radiology: Current Applications, Limitations and Future Directions of ChatGPT in Medical Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Development and Comparative Evaluation of a Reinstructed GPT-4o Model Specialized in Periodontology.Journal of clinical periodontology · 2025Article
- A scoping review on generative AI and large language models in mitigating medication related harm.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Can ChatGPT4-vision identify radiologic progression of multiple sclerosis on brain MRI?European radiology experimental · 2025Article
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of GPT-based differential diagnostic accuracy in radiological cases: 2023-2025.Frontiers in radiology · 2025Article
- The Picasso's skepticism on computer science and the dawn of generative AI: questions after the answers to keep "machines-in-the-loop".European radiology experimental · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe investigated the potential of an imaging-aware GPT-4-based chatbot in providing diagnoses based on imaging descriptions of abdominal pathologies.
methodsUtilizing zero-shot learning via the LlamaIndex framework, GPT-4 was enhanced using the 96 documents from the Radiographics Top 10 Reading List on gastrointestinal imaging, creating a gastrointestinal imaging-aware chatbot (GIA-CB). To assess its diagnostic capability, 50 cases on a variety of abdominal pathologies were created, comprising radiological findings in fluoroscopy, MRI, and CT. We compared the GIA-CB to the generic GPT-4 chatbot (g-CB) in providing the primary and 2 additional differential diagnoses, using interpretations from senior-level radiologists as ground truth. The trustworthiness of the GIA-CB was evaluated by investigating the source documents as provided by the knowledge-retrieval mechanism. Mann-Whitney U test was employed.
resultsThe GIA-CB demonstrated a high capability to identify the most appropriate differential diagnosis in 39/50 cases (78%), significantly surpassing the g-CB in 27/50 cases (54%) (p = 0.006). Notably, the GIA-CB offered the primary differential in the top 3 differential diagnoses in 45/50 cases (90%) versus g-CB with 37/50 cases (74%) (p = 0.022) and always with appropriate explanations. The median response time was 29.8 s for GIA-CB and 15.7 s for g-CB, and the mean cost per case was $0.15 and $0.02, respectively.
conclusionsThe GIA-CB not only provided an accurate diagnosis for gastrointestinal pathologies, but also direct access to source documents, providing insight into the decision-making process, a step towards trustworthy and explainable AI. Integrating context-specific data into AI models can support evidence-based clinical decision-making. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: A context-aware GPT-4 chatbot demonstrates high accuracy in providing differential diagnoses based on imaging descriptions, surpassing the generic GPT-4. It provided formulated rationale and source excerpts supporting the diagnoses, thus enhancing trustworthy decision-support. KEY POINTS: • Knowledge retrieval enhances differential diagnoses in a gastrointestinal imaging-aware chatbot (GIA-CB). • GIA-CB outperformed the generic counterpart, providing formulated rationale and source excerpts. • GIA-CB has the potential to pave the way for AI-assisted decision support systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.