ArticleScientific reports2024
Patient classification and attribute assessment based on machine learning techniques in the qualification process for surgical treatment of adrenal tumours.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adrenal gland incidentaloma is frequently identified through computed tomography and poses a common clinical challenge. Only selected cases require surgical intervention. The primary aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of selected machine learning (ML) techniques in proper qualifying patients for adrenalectomy and to identify the most accurate algorithm, providing a valuable tool for doctors to simplify their therapeutic decisions. The secondary aim was to assess the significance of attributes for classification accuracy. In total, clinical data were collected from 33 patients who underwent adrenalectomy. Histopathological assessments confirmed the proper selection of 21 patients for surgical intervention according to the guidelines, with accuracy reaching 64%. Statistical analysis showed that Supported Vector Machines (linear) were significantly better than the baseline (p < 0.05), with accuracy reaching 91%, and imaging features of the tumour were found to be the most crucial attributes. In summarise, ML methods may be helpful in qualifying patients for adrenalectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.