ArticleScientific reports2024
Multi-step forecasting of dissolved oxygen in River Ganga based on CEEMDAN-AdaBoost-BiLSTM-LSTM model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Decomposition prediction and optimal ensemble strategy improve river dissolved oxygen prediction accuracy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate prediction of Dissolved Oxygen (DO) is an integral part of water resource management. This study proposes a novel approach combining Complete Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition with Adaptive Noise (CEEMDAN) with AdaBoost and deep learning for multi-step forecasting of DO. CEEMDAN generates Intrinsic Mode Functions (IMFs) with different frequencies, capturing non-linear and non-stationary characteristics of the data. The high-frequency and medium-frequency IMFs, characterized by complex patterns and frequent changes over time, are predicted using Adaboost with Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM) as the base estimator. The low-frequency IMFs, characterized by relatively simple patterns, are predicted using standalone Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM). The proposed CEEMDAN-AdaBoost-BiLSTM-LSTM model is tested on data from ten stations of river Ganga. We compare the results with six models without decomposition and four models utilizing decomposition. Experimental results show that using a tailored prediction technique based on each IMF's distinctive features leads to more accurate forecasts. CEEMDAN-AdaBoost-BiLSTM-LSTM outperforms CEEMDAN-BiLSTM with an average improvement of 25.458% for RMSE and 37.390% for MAE. Compared with CEEMDAN-AdaBoost-BiLSTM, an average improvement of 20.779% for RMSE and 28.921% for MAE is observed. Diebold-Mariano test and t-test suggest a statistically significant difference in performance between the proposed and compared models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.