ArticleNature communications2024
Public engagement for inclusive and sustainable governance of climate interventions.
Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Public support for novel carbon removal hinges on procedural and distributive fairness.Nature climate change · 2026Article
- An ecosystem of carbon dioxide removal reviews - part 1: direct air COEnergy & environmental science · 2025Review
- Who pays for carbon dioxide removal? Public perceptions of risk and fairness of enhanced rock weathering in the UK.Humanities & social sciences communications · 2025Article
- Carbon removal beyond the trees.Communications earth & environment · 2025Article
- Carbon removal support is tempered by concerns over whether biological methods are worth it.Communications earth & environment · 2025Article
- Exploring global climate intervention experiments: sociotechnical promises, innovation dynamics, and perceived co-impacts across 20 projects and pilots.Sustainability science · 2025Article
- Partisanship overcomes framing in shaping solar geoengineering perceptions: Evidence from a conjoint experiment.npj climate action · 2025Article
- Achieving synergistic benefits through integrated governance of cultivated cadmium contamination via multistakeholder collaboration.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Demographics shape public preferences for carbon dioxide removal and solar geoengineering interventions across 30 countries.Communications earth & environment · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The need for public engagement is increasingly evident as discussions intensify around emerging methods for carbon dioxide removal and controversial proposals around solar geoengineering. Based on 44 focus groups in 22 countries across the Global North and Global South (N = 323 participants), this article traces public preferences for a variety of bottom-up and top-down engagement practices ranging from information recipient to broad decision authority. Here, we show that engagement practices need to be responsive to local political cultures and socio-technical environments, while attending to the global dimensions and interconnectedness of the issues at stake. Establishing public engagement as a cornerstone of inclusive and sustainable governance of climate-intervention technologies requires (i) recognizing the diversity of forms and intensities of engaging, (ii) considering national contexts and modes of engagement, (iii) tailoring to technological idiosyncrasies, (iv) adopting power-sensitive practices, (v) accounting for publics' prior experience, (vi) establishing trust and procedural legitimacy and (vii) engaging with tensions and value disagreements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.