Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38754917›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2024

Comprehensive profiling of cancer neoantigens from aberrant RNA splicing.

Daniel P Wickland, Colton McNinch, Erik Jessen, Brian Necela, Barath Shreeder, Yi Lin, Keith L Knutson, Yan W Asmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Daniel P Wickland *Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5313-6276
Colton McNinch *National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Erik JessenDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Brian NecelaDepartment of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Barath ShreederDepartment of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Yi LinDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Keith L KnutsonDepartment of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9932-4467
Yan W AsmannDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA asmann.yan@mayo.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer neoantigens arise from protein-altering somatic mutations in tumor and rank among the most promising next-generation immuno-oncology agents when used in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors. We previously developed a computational framework, REAL-neo, for identification, quality control, and prioritization of both class-I and class-II human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-presented neoantigens resulting from somatic single-nucleotide mutations, small insertions and deletions, and gene fusions. In this study, we developed a new module, SPLICE-neo, to identify neoantigens from aberrant RNA transcripts from two distinct sources: (1) DNA mutations within splice sites and (2) de novo RNA aberrant splicings.

methodsFirst, SPLICE-neo was used to profile all DNA splice-site mutations in 11,892 tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and identified 11 profiles of splicing donor or acceptor site gains or losses. Transcript isoforms resulting from the top seven most frequent profiles were computed using novel logic models. Second, SPLICE-neo identified de novo RNA splicing events using RNA sequencing reads mapped to novel exon junctions from either single, double, or multiple exon-skipping events. The aberrant transcripts from both sources were then ranked based on isoform expression levels and z-scores assuming that individual aberrant splicing events are rare. Finally, top-ranked novel isoforms were translated into protein, and the resulting neoepitopes were evaluated for neoantigen potential using REAL-neo. The top splicing neoantigen candidates binding to HLA-A*02:01 were validated using in vitro T2 binding assays.

resultsWe identified abundant splicing neoantigens in four representative TCGA cancers: BRCA, LUAD, LUSC, and LIHC. In addition to their substantial contribution to neoantigen load, several splicing neoantigens were potent tumor antigens with stronger bindings to HLA compared with the positive control of antigens from influenza virus.

conclusionsSPLICE-neo is the first tool to comprehensively identify and prioritize splicing neoantigens from both DNA splice-site mutations and de novo RNA aberrant splicings. There are two major advances of SPLICE-neo. First, we developed novel logic models that assemble and prioritize full-length aberrant transcripts from DNA splice-site mutations. Second, SPLICE-neo can identify exon-skipping events involving more than two exons, which account for a quarter to one-third of all skipping events.

Indexed as

Antigens, NeoplasmNeoplasmsRNA SplicingHumansAntigens, NeoplasmGenomeHuman leukocyte antigen - HLAImmunotherapyMajor histocompatibility complex - MHCNext generation sequencing - NGS

Identifiers

PMID38754917
PMCPMC11097882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.