ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
Optimal fusion of genotype and drug embeddings in predicting cancer drug response.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Visible neural networks for multi-omics integration: a critical review.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Pooled it
- MiracleNet: A Biologically Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Resected Non-small-cell Lung Cancer.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Beyond the black box with biologically informed neural networks.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predicting cancer drug response using both genomics and drug features has shown some success compared to using genomics features alone. However, there has been limited research done on how best to combine or fuse the two types of features. Using a visible neural network with two deep learning branches for genes and drug features as the base architecture, we experimented with different fusion functions and fusion points. Our experiments show that injecting multiplicative relationships between gene and drug latent features into the original concatenation-based architecture DrugCell significantly improved the overall predictive performance and outperformed other baseline models. We also show that different fusion methods respond differently to different fusion points, indicating that the relationship between drug features and different hierarchical biological level of gene features is optimally captured using different methods. Considering both predictive performance and runtime speed, tensor product partial is the best-performing fusion function to combine late-stage representations of drug and gene features to predict cancer drug response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.