ArticleJournal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research2024
Comparative effectiveness of denosumab vs alendronate among postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.
Article in Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparison of the Efficacy of Denosumab and Alendronate in Improving Bone Mineral Density in Osteoporosis Patients and High-Risk Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical drug investigation · 2026Pooled it
- Phase 3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of proposed biosimilar RGB-14-P with denosumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from the transition (switch) phase.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026Trial
- Denosumab and bone loss in uncemented total hip arthroplasty: a secondary 5-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.Acta orthopaedica · 2026Trial
- A randomised Phase 3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of proposed denosumab biosimilar RGB-14-P and reference denosumab in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025Trial
- Zoledronate Sequential Therapy After Denosumab Discontinuation to Prevent Bone Mineral Density Reduction: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2024Trial
- Bone aging: a paradigm of multiscale degeneration and targeted rejuvenation.Bone research · 2026Review
- Impact of a national reimbursement policy for secondary fracture prevention on early secondary fractures after hip fracture surgery in Japan: a nationwide interrupted time series analysis.Archives of osteoporosis · 2026Article
- Association of implementation of secondary fracture prevention incentives after hip fracture and risk of subsequent fracture in real-world practice.European geriatric medicine · 2026Article
- Preventing Hip (Proximal Femoral) Fractures: An Evidence-Based Review for Clinicians.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- From metabolic node to smart building block: α-Ketoglutarate-empowered biomaterials for programmable cell fate.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Long-term treatment with denosumab in patients with celiac disease and osteoporosis at high risk of fracture: a retrospective study.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Denosumab with Eldecalcitol or Native Vitamin D in Postmenopausal Chinese Women with Osteoporosis (ESCORT): A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- 24-month real-world persistence and compliance of denosumab versus alendronate among postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in Australia, Taiwan, South Korea, Hong Kong, and Singapore.Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2026Article
- Article
- Hydroxysafflor yellow A attenuatesovariectomy induced bone loss andpromotes osteogenesis via PI3K/AKT activation in an in vitro BMSC model.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Trends and prescribing patterns of antiosteoporosis medicines in Chinese patients: a real-world retrospective study.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2026Article
- Article
- Construction of a nomogram prediction model for individualized prediction of vertebral compression fracture risk in postmenopausal osteoporosis population.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Synergistic Efficacy of Calcitriol Combined with Denosumab versus Calcitriol Alone in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Awareness, attitudes and practices for osteoporosis prevention among postmenopausal women: A mixed-method survey and DEXA correlation.Bioinformation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although clinical trials have shown that denosumab significantly increases bone mineral density at key skeletal sites more than oral bisphosphonates, evidence is lacking from head-to-head randomized trials evaluating fracture outcomes. This retrospective cohort study uses administrative claims data from Medicare fee-for service beneficiaries to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of denosumab vs alendronate in reducing fracture risk among women with PMO in the US. Women with PMO ≥ 66 yr of age with no prior history of osteoporosis treatment, who initiated denosumab (n = 89 115) or alendronate (n = 389 536) from 2012 to 2018, were followed from treatment initiation until the first of a specific fracture outcome, treatment discontinuation or switch, end of study (December 31, 2019), or other censoring criteria. A doubly robust inverse-probability of treatment and censoring weighted function was used to estimate the risk ratio associated with the use of denosumab compared with alendronate for hip, nonvertebral (NV; includes hip, humerus, pelvis, radius/ulna, other femur), non-hip nonvertebral (NHNV), hospitalized vertebral (HV), and major osteoporotic (MOP; consisting of NV and HV) fractures. Overall, denosumab reduced the risk of MOP by 39%, hip by 36%, NV by 43%, NHNV by 50%, and HV fractures by 30% compared with alendronate. Denosumab reduced the risk of MOP fractures by 9% at year 1, 12% at year 2, 18% at year 3, and 31% at year 5. An increase in the magnitude of fracture risk reduction with increasing duration of exposure was also observed for other NV fracture outcomes. In this cohort of almost half-a-million treatment-naive women with PMO, we observed clinically significant reductions in the risk of MOP, hip, NV, NHNV, and HV fractures for patients on denosumab compared with alendronate. Patients who remained on denosumab for longer periods of time experienced greater reductions in fracture risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.