Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38753705›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Analytical validation of a novel comprehensive genomic profiling informed circulating tumor DNA monitoring assay for solid tumors.

Daniel R Zollinger, Elizabeth Rivers, Alexander Fine, Yanmei Huang, Joseph Son, Akshita Kalyan, Wren Gray, Golshid Baharian, Carly Hammond, Rosalyn Ram and 23 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Liquid biopsy in solid tumours: expert opinion paper of the European society of pathology.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors.

Daniel R ZollingerFoundation Medicine Inc, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0181-4228
Elizabeth RiversNatera, Austin, TX, United States of America.
Alexander FineFoundation Medicine Inc, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
Yanmei HuangFoundation Medicine Inc, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
Joseph SonNatera, Austin, TX, United States of America.
Akshita KalyanNatera, Austin, TX, United States of America.
Wren GrayNatera, Austin, TX, United States of America.
Golshid BaharianNatera, Austin, TX, United States of America.
Carly HammondNatera, Austin, TX, United States of America.
Rosalyn RamNatera, Austin, TX, United States of America.
Lindsay RingmanNatera, Austin, TX, United States of America.
Dina HafezNatera, Austin, TX, United States of America.
Daniel SavelNatera, Austin, TX, United States of America.
Vipul PatelNatera, Austin, TX, United States of America.
Marc DantoneNatera, Austin, TX, United States of America.
Cui GuoFoundation Medicine Inc, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
Merrida ChildressFoundation Medicine Inc, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
Chang XuFoundation Medicine Inc, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
Dorhyun JohngFoundation Medicine Inc, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5463-4338
Brett WalldenFoundation Medicine Inc, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
Prapti PokharelFoundation Medicine Inc, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
William CamaraFoundation Medicine Inc, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
Priti S HegdeFoundation Medicine Inc, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
Jason HughesFoundation Medicine Inc, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
Corey CarterRoche/Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
Nicole DavarpanahRoche/Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
Viraj DegaonkarRoche/Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
Pratyush GuptaRoche/Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3927-6496
Sanjeev MariathasanRoche/Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
Thomas PowlesBarts Cancer Institute, Barts Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Barts Health, London, United Kingdom.
Sean FerreeNatera, Austin, TX, United States of America.
Lucas DennisFoundation Medicine Inc, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
Amanda YoungFoundation Medicine Inc, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2199-1873

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emerging technologies focused on the detection and quantification of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in blood show extensive potential for managing patient treatment decisions, informing risk of recurrence, and predicting response to therapy. Currently available tissue-informed approaches are often limited by the need for additional sequencing of normal tissue or peripheral mononuclear cells to identify non-tumor-derived alterations while tissue-naïve approaches are often limited in sensitivity. Here we present the analytical validation for a novel ctDNA monitoring assay, FoundationOne®Tracker. The assay utilizes somatic alterations from comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) of tumor tissue. A novel algorithm identifies monitorable alterations with a high probability of being somatic and computationally filters non-tumor-derived alterations such as germline or clonal hematopoiesis variants without the need for sequencing of additional samples. Monitorable alterations identified from tissue CGP are then quantified in blood using a multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay based on the validated SignateraTM assay. The analytical specificity of the plasma workflow is shown to be 99.6% at the sample level. Analytical sensitivity is shown to be >97.3% at ≥5 mean tumor molecules per mL of plasma (MTM/mL) when tested with the most conservative configuration using only two monitorable alterations. The assay also demonstrates high analytical accuracy when compared to liquid biopsy-based CGP as well as high qualitative (measured 100% PPA) and quantitative precision (<11.2% coefficient of variation).

Indexed as

Circulating Tumor DNANeoplasmsAlgorithmsBiomarkers, TumorGenomicsHumansLiquid BiopsyMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNA

Identifiers

PMID38753705
PMCPMC11098318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.