Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38753647›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Adapting a selective parent-focused child sexual abuse prevention curriculum for a universal audience: A pilot study.

Kate Guastaferro, Vanessa Abuchaibe, Kaylee V McCormick, Arushee Bhoja, Ella Abourjaily, Mia Melchior, Corinne Grayson, Paige Welikson, Colin Dan, Meron B Zeleke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kate GuastaferroSchool of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5616-9708
Vanessa AbuchaibeSchool of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Kaylee V McCormickMission Kids Child Advocacy Center, East Norriton, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0003-2588-8501
Arushee BhojaSchool of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Ella AbourjailySchool of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Mia MelchiorSchool of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Corinne GraysonSchool of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Paige WeliksonSchool of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Colin DanSchool of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Meron B ZelekeSchool of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parents are an obvious, but underutilized player in the prevention of child sexual abuse (CSA). A handful of universal parent-focused prevention programs have emerged, however, the evidence for these programs is mixed and the programs suffer ubiquitously from barriers to implementation (e.g., poor engagement, low participation) thereby limiting public health impact. To combat these barriers and improve evidence, researchers previously developed and tested a selective parent-focused CSA prevention program. While promising, the selective approach still leaves a gap in the prevention landscape-parents from the universal audience. However, there appear to be no standardized methods to inform this type of adaptation-interventions designed as universal or selective have primarily been delivered as such. This study sought to adapt the selective curriculum for a universal audience and examined the acceptability and feasibility of the program for evaluation in a future trial. Using mixed methods, N = 31 parents (i.e., primary caregiver for a child under 13) completed pre- and post-workshop surveys followed by a brief individual interview conducted via Zoom. Interviews, coded using content analysis methods, focused on three themes: parents as agents of prevention (e.g., prior action, confidence), curriculum (e.g., content, design), and engagement (e.g., future marketing and promotion). Overall participants' mean score on CSA-related awareness and intention to use protective behavioral strategies increased. The participants found the curriculum highly acceptable noting strengths in the content and design. All told, the results of this pilot study suggest the acceptability and feasibility of examining the efficacy of the universal parent-focused curriculum in a larger trial. Procedural challenges, such as bots in recruitment, identify areas of caution in design of the larger trial and a roadmap for others seeking to adapt selective programs for universal audiences.

Indexed as

Child Abuse, SexualCurriculumParentsAdultChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID38753647
PMCPMC11098426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.