Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38753398›Full record

ReviewBehavioral neuroscience2024

Leveraging individual differences in cue-reward learning to investigate the psychological and neural basis of shared psychiatric symptomatology: The sign-tracker/goal-tracker model.

Princess C Felix, Shelly B Flagel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Behavioral neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Reduced Pavlovian Value Updating Alters Decision-Making in Sign-Trackers.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Using sign tracking to experimentally increase self-control in rats.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Princess C FelixNeuroscience Graduate Program, University of Michigan.ORCID 0000-0002-7901-8670
Shelly B FlagelMichigan Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan.ORCID 0000-0002-7309-9908

Funding

NIDA Training Program in Neuroscience-Administrative SupplementT32DA007281 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Shelly Beth Flagel · 1995 to 2026
$5.7M
Probing the role of a hypothalamic-thalamic-striatal circuit in cue-driven behaviorsR01DA054094 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI FLAGEL, SHELLY BETH · 2021 to 2025
$2.8M
Dynamic control of cue-driven behavior via the paraventricular thalamic nucleusR01DA038599 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI FLAGEL, SHELLY BETH · 2015 to 2019
$2.7M
Identification of Neurochemical Antecedents and Consequences of Distinct Learning Processes Relevant to Addiction LiabilityR21DA045146 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI FLAGEL, SHELLY BETH · 2018 to 2019
$442k
The glucocorticoid receptor as a mechanism of top-down control of cue-motivated behaviorR21DA052594 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI FLAGEL, SHELLY BETH · 2021 to 2022
$429k
National Institutes of Health; National Institute on Drug AbuseNIDA NIH HHS R01 DA038599NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA054094NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA045146NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA052594NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007281Pritzker Neuropsychiatric Disorders Research Consortium
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In our modern environment, we are bombarded with stimuli or cues that exert significant influence over our actions. The extent to which such cues attain control over or disrupt goal-directed behavior is dependent on several factors, including one's inherent tendencies. Using a rodent model, we have shown that individuals vary in the value they place on stimuli associated with reward. Some individuals, termed "goal-trackers," primarily attribute predictive value to reward cues, whereas others, termed "sign-trackers," attribute predictive and incentive value. Thus, for sign-trackers, the reward cue is transformed into an incentive stimulus that is capable of eliciting maladaptive behaviors. The sign-tracker/goal-tracker animal model has allowed us to refine our understanding of behavioral and computational theories related to reward learning and to parse the underlying neural processes. Further, the neurobehavioral profile of sign-trackers is relevant to several psychiatric disorders, including substance use disorder, impulse control disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and posttraumatic stress disorder. This model, therefore, can advance our understanding of the psychological and neurobiological mechanisms that contribute to individual differences in vulnerability to psychopathology. Notably, initial attempts at translation-capturing individual variability in the propensity to sign-track in humans-have been promising and in line with what we have learned from the animal model. In this review, we highlight the pivotal role played by the sign-tracker/goal-tracker animal model in enriching our understanding of the psychological and neural basis of motivated behavior and psychiatric symptomatology. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

CuesGoalsIndividualityMotivationRewardAnimalsBrainHumansLearningMental Disorders

Identifiers

PMID38753398
PMCPMC11894610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.