ArticleEndocrine2024
Prediction of TNFRSF9 expression and molecular pathological features in thyroid cancer using machine learning to construct Pathomics models.
Article in Endocrine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Postoperative early recurrence prediction of pancreatic cancer based on CT and pathomics.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Unveiling the interplay among skin microbiota, cytokines, and T2DM: an insightful Mendelian randomization study.Nutrition & metabolism · 2025Article
- Application progress of artificial intelligence in managing thyroid disease.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Prognostic and predictive value of pathohistological features in gastric cancer and identification of SLITRK4 as a potential biomarker for gastric cancer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe TNFRSF9 molecule is pivotal in thyroid carcinoma (THCA) development. This study utilizes Pathomics techniques to predict TNFRSF9 expression in THCA tissue and explore its molecular mechanisms.
methodsTranscriptome data, pathology images, and clinical information from the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) were analyzed. Image segmentation and feature extraction were performed using the OTSU's algorithm and pyradiomics package. The dataset was split for training and validation. Features were selected using maximum relevance minimum redundancy recursive feature elimination (mRMR_RFE) and modeling conducted with the gradient boosting machine (GBM) algorithm. Model evaluation included receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. The Pathomics model output a probabilistic pathomics score (PS) for gene expression prediction, with its prognostic value assessed in TNFRSF9 expression groups. Subsequent analysis involved gene set variation analysis (GSVA), immune gene expression, cell abundance, immunotherapy susceptibility, and gene mutation analysis.
resultsHigh TNFRSF9 expression correlated with worsened progression-free interval (PFI) and acted as an independent risk factor [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.178, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.045-4.538, P = 0.038]. Nine pathohistological features were identified. The GBM Pathomics model demonstrated good prediction efficacy [area under the curve (AUC) 0.819 and 0.769] and clinical benefits. High PS was a PFI risk factor (HR = 2.156, 95% CI 1.047-4.440, P = 0.037). Patients with high PS potentially exhibited enriched pathways, increased TIGIT gene expression, Tregs infiltration (P < 0.0001), and higher rates of gene mutations (BRAF, TTN, TG).
conclusionsThe GBM Pathomics model constructed based on the pathohistological features of H&E-stained sections well predicted the expression level of TNFRSF9 molecules in THCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38753243What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.