Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38753100›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2025

No evidence for cross-paradigm transfer of abstract task knowledge in adults and school-aged children.

Kaichi Yanaoka, Félice van 't Wout, Satoru Saito, Christopher Jarrold

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kaichi YanaokaOsaka Kyoiku University, 4-88 Minami Kawahoricho, Tennoji, Osaka, 543-0054, Japan. makifactor@gmail.com.
Félice van 't WoutUniversity of Exeter, Perry Road, Prince of Wales Road, Exeter, EX4 4QG, UK.
Satoru SaitoKyoto University, Yoshidahonmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
Christopher JarroldUniversity of Bristol, 12a Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TU, UK.

Funding

JSPS Bilateral Joint Research Project, JPJSBP120209916JSPS Grant-in-Aid for for Scientific Research 20H01786
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive control is a hallmark of human cognition. A large number of studies have focused on the plasticity of cognitive control and examined how repeated task experience leads to the improvement of cognitive control in novel task environments. However, it has been demonstrated that training-induced changes are very selective and that transfer occurs within one task paradigm but not across different task paradigms. The current study tested the possibility that cross-paradigm transfer would occur if a common cognitive control strategy is employed across different task paradigms. Specifically, we examined whether prior experience of using reactive control in one task paradigm (i.e., either the cued task-switching paradigm or the AX-CPT) makes adults (N = 137) and 9- to 10-year-olds (N = 126) respond in a reactive way in a subsequent condition of another task paradigm in which proactive control could have been engaged. Bayesian generalized mixed-effects models revealed clear evidence of an absence of cross-paradigm transfer of reactive control in both adults and school-aged children. Based on these findings, we discuss to what extent learned control could be transferred across different task contexts and the task-specificity of proactive/reactive control strategies.

Indexed as

Executive FunctionPsychomotor PerformanceTransfer, PsychologyAdultChildCuesFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultChildrenCognitive controlCross-paradigm transferProactive/reactive controlTask knowledge

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.