Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38753031›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2024

Genome Assembly of the Dyeing Poison Frog Provides Insights into the Dynamics of Transposable Element and Genome-Size Evolution.

Carolin Dittrich, Franz Hoelzl, Steve Smith, Chloe A Fouilloux, Darren J Parker, Lauren A O'Connell, Lucy S Knowles, Margaret Hughes, Ade Fewings, Rhys Morgan and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genome size evolution and phenotypic correlates in the poison frog family Dendrobatidae.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. A draft genome assembly for the dart-poison frogGigaByte (Hong Kong, China) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Carolin DittrichDepartment of Biology and Environmental Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Franz HoelzlDepartment of Interdisciplinary Life Sciences, Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.
Steve SmithDepartment of Interdisciplinary Life Sciences, Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.
Chloe A FouillouxDepartment of Biology and Environmental Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Darren J ParkerSchool of Environmental and Natural Sciences, Molecular Ecology & Evolution Group, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Lauren A O'ConnellDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2706-4077
Lucy S KnowlesNERC Environmental Omics Facility, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Margaret HughesCentre for Genomic Research, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Ade FewingsSupercomputing Wales, Digital Services, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Rhys MorganSchool of Environmental and Natural Sciences, Molecular Ecology & Evolution Group, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Bibiana RojasDepartment of Biology and Environmental Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-6715-7294
Aaron A ComeaultSchool of Environmental and Natural Sciences, Molecular Ecology & Evolution Group, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3954-2416

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome size varies greatly across the tree of life and transposable elements are an important contributor to this variation. Among vertebrates, amphibians display the greatest variation in genome size, making them ideal models to explore the causes and consequences of genome size variation. However, high-quality genome assemblies for amphibians have, until recently, been rare. Here, we generate a high-quality genome assembly for the dyeing poison frog, Dendrobates tinctorius. We compare this assembly to publicly available frog genomes and find evidence for both large-scale conserved synteny and widespread rearrangements between frog lineages. Comparing conserved orthologs annotated in these genomes revealed a strong correlation between genome size and gene size. To explore the cause of gene-size variation, we quantified the location of transposable elements relative to gene features and find that the accumulation of transposable elements in introns has played an important role in the evolution of gene size in D. tinctorius, while estimates of insertion times suggest that many insertion events are recent and species-specific. Finally, we carry out population-scale mobile-element sequencing and show that the diversity and abundance of transposable elements in poison frog genomes can complicate genotyping from repetitive element sequence anchors. Our results show that transposable elements have clearly played an important role in the evolution of large genome size in D. tinctorius. Future studies are needed to fully understand the dynamics of transposable element evolution and to optimize primer or bait design for cost-effective population-level genotyping in species with large, repetitive genomes.

Indexed as

AnuraDNA Transposable ElementsEvolution, MolecularGenomeGenome SizeAnimalsPoison FrogsDNA Transposable Elementsamphibiansgenome evolutionlong-readsMobiSeqtransposable elements

Identifiers

PMID38753031
PMCPMC11152451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.