ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2024
[Interoperability Working Group: core dataset and information systems for data integration and data exchange in the Medical Informatics Initiative].
Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- A distributed analysis approach for pharmacovigilance data from electronic medical records in German university hospitals: the POLAR_MI ETL Pipeline.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- [Evidence generation and methodological consultation by the project "EVAluation research based on data from routine clinical care 4 the Medical Informatics Initiative" (EVA4MII)].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026Review
- A Data-Centric Approach for Health Care and Research in a Health Knowledge Management Platform: Implementation and Requirement-Based Evaluation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Use of Potentially Inappropriate Medication and Association with Falls During Hospitalisation: An Analysis Based on Electronic Health Records (POLAR_MI project).Drugs - real world outcomes · 2026Article
- Applicability of Existing Gender Scores for German Clinical Research Data: Scoping Review and Data Mapping.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Challenges and solutions in determining urolithiasis caseloads using the digital infrastructure of a clinical data warehouse.PloS one · 2026Article
- On the crossroads of interdisciplinary medicine in amyloidosis - study protocol for a single-center interdisciplinary registry study.PloS one · 2026Article
- BabelFSH-a toolkit for an effective HL7 FHIR-based terminology provision.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2025Article
- Lessons Learned From Building a Data Platform for Longitudinal, Analytical Use Cases and Scaling to 77 German Hospitals: Implementation Report.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Leveraging Interoperable Electronic Health Record (EHR) Data for Distributed Analyses in Clinical Research: Technical Implementation Report of the HELP Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Challenges in detecting and predicting adverse drug events via distributed analysis of electronic health record data from German university hospitals.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based forecasting of daily acute ischemic stroke admissions using weather data.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Large-Scale Integration of DICOM Metadata into HL7-FHIR for Medical Research.Methods of information in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The interoperability Working Group of the Medical Informatics Initiative (MII) is the platform for the coordination of overarching procedures, data structures, and interfaces between the data integration centers (DIC) of the university hospitals and national and international interoperability committees. The goal is the joint content-related and technical design of a distributed infrastructure for the secondary use of healthcare data that can be used via the Research Data Portal for Health. Important general conditions are data privacy and IT security for the use of health data in biomedical research. To this end, suitable methods are used in dedicated task forces to enable procedural, syntactic, and semantic interoperability for data use projects. The MII core dataset was developed as several modules with corresponding information models and implemented using the HL7® FHIR® standard to enable content-related and technical specifications for the interoperable provision of healthcare data through the DIC. International terminologies and consented metadata are used to describe these data in more detail. The overall architecture, including overarching interfaces, implements the methodological and legal requirements for a distributed data use infrastructure, for example, by providing pseudonymized data or by federated analyses. With these results of the Interoperability Working Group, the MII is presenting a future-oriented solution for the exchange and use of healthcare data, the applicability of which goes beyond the purpose of research and can play an essential role in the digital transformation of the healthcare system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.