ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2024
[Digital health progress hubs-data integration beyond university hospitals].
Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mainzelliste: Ten years of pseudonymization, record linkage, and informed consent management.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Analyzing and predicting patient admissions related to acute heat at the Chemnitz Hospital (Germany).Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025Article
- Article
- Analyzing the association between heat and utilization of inpatient care: evidence from Dresden University Hospital (Germany).BMC public health · 2025Article
- Lessons Learned From Building a Data Platform for Longitudinal, Analytical Use Cases and Scaling to 77 German Hospitals: Implementation Report.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- The Spectrum of Heat-Related Diseases - A Meta-Review.International journal of public health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The digital health progress hubs pilot the extensibility of the concepts and solutions of the Medical Informatics Initiative to improve regional healthcare and research. The six funded projects address different diseases, areas in regional healthcare, and methods of cross-institutional data linking and use. Despite the diversity of the scenarios and regional conditions, the technical, regulatory, and organizational challenges and barriers that the progress hubs encounter in the actual implementation of the solutions are often similar. This results in some common approaches to solutions, but also in political demands that go beyond the Health Data Utilization Act, which is considered a welcome improvement by the progress hubs.In this article, we present the digital progress hubs and discuss achievements, challenges, and approaches to solutions that enable the shared use of data from university hospitals and non-academic institutions in the healthcare system and can make a sustainable contribution to improving medical care and research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.