RevieweLife2024
Misstatements, misperceptions, and mistakes in controlling for covariates in observational research.
Review in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Correlation does not equal causation: the imperative of causal inference in machine learning models for immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Joint association of Insulin resistance and frailty index with incident ASCVD and MACE in individuals with cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome stages 0-3: a multi-cohort study.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2026Observational
- Focused ultrasound for brain metastases.Neuro-oncology advances · 2026Review
- Pair-Feeding Study Designs Can Create Biases and Inflate Type I Error Rates: A Simulation Study.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2026Article
- Standardizing the analysis and visualization of human energy expenditure data.Nature metabolism · 2026Article
- Preliminary validation of developmental weight suppression in youth with transdiagnostic eating disorders.Journal of eating disorders · 2025Article
- Leptomeningeal metastatic disease: new frontiers and future directions.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We discuss 12 misperceptions, misstatements, or mistakes concerning the use of covariates in observational or
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.