Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38752979›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2024

Mapping the differential impact of spontaneous and conversational laughter on brain and mind: an fMRI study in autism.

Ceci Qing Cai, Nadine Lavan, Sinead H Y Chen, Claire Z X Wang, Ozan Cem Ozturk, Roni Man Ying Chiu, Sam J Gilbert, Sarah J White, Sophie K Scott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Autistic adults form first impressions from voices in similar ways to non-autistic adults.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ceci Qing CaiInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London WC1N 3AZ, United Kingdom.
Nadine LavanDepartment of Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom.
Sinead H Y ChenInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London WC1N 3AZ, United Kingdom.
Claire Z X WangInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London WC1N 3AZ, United Kingdom.
Ozan Cem OzturkInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London WC1N 3AZ, United Kingdom.
Roni Man Ying ChiuDepartment of Social and Behavioural Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR.
Sam J GilbertInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London WC1N 3AZ, United Kingdom.
Sarah J WhiteInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London WC1N 3AZ, United Kingdom.
Sophie K ScottInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London WC1N 3AZ, United Kingdom.

Funding

Academy of Medical Sciences SBF003\1169Royal Society DH150167
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spontaneous and conversational laughter are important socio-emotional communicative signals. Neuroimaging findings suggest that non-autistic people engage in mentalizing to understand the meaning behind conversational laughter. Autistic people may thus face specific challenges in processing conversational laughter, due to their mentalizing difficulties. Using fMRI, we explored neural differences during implicit processing of these two types of laughter. Autistic and non-autistic adults passively listened to funny words, followed by spontaneous laughter, conversational laughter, or noise-vocoded vocalizations. Behaviourally, words plus spontaneous laughter were rated as funnier than words plus conversational laughter, and the groups did not differ. However, neuroimaging results showed that non-autistic adults exhibited greater medial prefrontal cortex activation while listening to words plus conversational laughter, than words plus genuine laughter, while autistic adults showed no difference in medial prefrontal cortex activity between these two laughter types. Our findings suggest a crucial role for the medial prefrontal cortex in understanding socio-emotionally ambiguous laughter via mentalizing. Our study also highlights the possibility that autistic people may face challenges in understanding the essence of the laughter we frequently encounter in everyday life, especially in processing conversational laughter that carries complex meaning and social ambiguity, potentially leading to social vulnerability. Therefore, we advocate for clearer communication with autistic people.

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderBrainBrain MappingLaughterMagnetic Resonance ImagingAcoustic StimulationAdultFemaleHumansMalePrefrontal CortexYoung AdultautismfMRIlaughtermedial prefrontal cortexsocial communication

Identifiers

PMID38752979
PMCPMC11097909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.