ArticleJACC. Clinical electrophysiology2024
Conduction Velocity and Anisotropic Properties of Fibrillation Waves During Acutely Induced and Long-Standing Persistent AF.
Article in JACC. Clinical electrophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Restoring anisotropy after myocardial injury: strategies to align transplanted human induced pluripotent stem-cell-derived cardiomyocytes.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Spatially heterogeneous ionic remodelling promotes wavefront instability in simulated atrial tissue.Frontiers in network physiology · 2026Article
- Targeting the Substrate: Mechanism-Based Ablation Strategies for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- High-Density and Resolution Epicardial Mapping of the Atria: Translational Research with Clinical Impact.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Navigating the Stormy Sea of Anisotropy: How Electroanatomic Properties Influence Complex Propagation in Atrial Fibrillation.JACC. Clinical electrophysiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundQuantified features of local conduction heterogeneity due to pathological alterations of myocardial tissue could serve as a marker for the degree of electrical remodeling and hence be used to determine the stage of atrial fibrillation (AF).
objectivesIn this study, the authors investigated whether local directional heterogeneity (LDH) and anisotropy ratio, derived from estimated local conduction velocities (CVs) during AF, are suitable electrical parameters to stage AF.
methodsEpicardial mapping (244-electrode array, interelectrode distance 2.25 mm) of the right atrium was performed during acute atrial fibrillation (AAF) (n = 25, 32 ± 11 years of age) and during long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (LSPAF) (n = 23, 64 ± 9 years of age). Episodes of 9 ± 4 seconds of AF were analyzed. Local CV vectors were constructed to assess the degree of anisotropy. Directions and magnitudes of individual vectors were compared with surrounding vectors to identify LDH.
resultsCompared with the entire AAF group, LSPAF was characterized by slower conduction (71.5 ± 6.8 cm/s vs 67.6 ± 5.6 cm/s; P = 0.037) with a larger dispersion (1.59 ± 0.21 vs 1.95 ± 0.17; P < 0.001) and temporal variability (32.0 ± 4.7 cm/s vs 38.5 ± 3.3 cm/s; P < 0.001). Also, LSPAF was characterized by more LDH (19.6% ± 4.4% vs 26.0% ± 3.4%; P < 0.001) and a higher degree of anisotropy (1.38 ± 0.07 vs 1.51 ± 0.14; P < 0.001). Compared with the most complex type of AAF (type III), LSPAF was still associated with a larger CV dispersion, higher temporal variability of CV, and larger amount of LDH.
conclusionsIncreasing AF complexity was associated with increased spatiotemporal variability of local CV vectors, local conduction heterogeneity, and anisotropy ratio. By using these novel parameters, LSPAF could potentially be discriminated from the most complex type of AAF. These observations may indicate pathological alterations of myocardial tissue underlying progression of AF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38752952What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.