Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38752805›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2024

Attitudes and Exposure to Illicit Tobacco in England, 2022.

Nathan Davies, Tessa Langley, Leah Jayes, Manpreet Bains, Jamie Brown, Deborah Arnott, Ilze Bogdanovica

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nathan DaviesSchool of Medicine, Nottingham City Hospital, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9112-6471
Tessa LangleySchool of Medicine, Nottingham City Hospital, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9560-1148
Leah JayesInstitute of Health and Allied Professions, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5240-6286
Manpreet BainsSchool of Medicine, Nottingham City Hospital, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1990-5948
Jamie BrownInstitute of Epidemiology & Health Care, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2797-5428
Deborah ArnottAction on Smoking and Health, The Foundry, London, UK.
Ilze BogdanovicaSchool of Medicine, Nottingham City Hospital, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Funding

British Heart FoundationCancer Research UKCancer Research UK PRCRPG-Nov21\100002Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health and Social Care DirectoratesEconomic and Social Research CouncilEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilHealth and Social Care Research and Development Division (Welsh Government)Medical Research CouncilNational Institute for Health ResearchNatural Environment Research CouncilPublic Health Agency (Northern Ireland)The Health Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe United Kingdom has achieved reductions in illicit tobacco (IT) market size and share. However, there remains a 17.7% tobacco duty gap, contributing to health inequalities. In January 2024, the UK government announced a new strategy to control IT, along with provision of new funding.

methodsA representative cross-sectional survey of adults in England ran in April 2022 to evaluate attitudes and exposure to IT. Tobacco smokers were asked questions about encounters with IT, while all participants answered questions on knowledge and perspectives on IT.

resultsOf 262 tobacco smokers, 18.3% (95% CI 13.8% to 23.6%) had come across IT in the past year. Men had four times the odds of encountering IT recently than women. Among 1767 adults responding to questions on IT, two-thirds agreed IT harmed children, and more than half agreed IT was linked to organized crime. Younger adults, smokers, and those in lower socioeconomic groups were less likely to agree IT was harmful.

conclusionsExposure to IT, especially among younger males, remains a concern. While most of the public acknowledge its harm, this is not universal, and some population groups are less likely to do so. IMPLICATIONS: The study highlights persistent exposure to IT in England, especially among younger males, and varying perceptions of IT harm across socioeconomic groups. Tackling IT requires collaboration between health and enforcement agencies, independent of the tobacco industry's influence. Strategies should include components that shift demand for IT and denormalize its presence in communities, particularly in lower socioeconomic areas with higher smoking prevalence.

Indexed as

Tobacco ProductsAdolescentAdultAgedCrimeCross-Sectional StudiesEnglandFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedSmokersSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38752805
PMCPMC11494475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.