Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38752736›Full record

ArticleStroke2024

Arterial Recanalization During Interhospital Transfer for Thrombectomy.

Pierre Seners, Anke Wouters, Adrien Ter Schiphorst, Nicole Yuen, Michael Mlynash, Caroline Arquizan, Jeremy J Heit, Stephanie Kemp, Soren Christensen, Denis Sablot and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stroke, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Acute ischemic stroke patient factors associated with poor outcomes in patients with favorable collaterals and successful thrombectomy.Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Drip and ship in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a narrative review.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Pierre SenersStanford Stroke Center, Palo Alto, CA (P.S., A.W., N.Y., M.M., S.K., S.C., M.G.L., G.W.A.).ORCID 0000-0002-2134-0691
Anke WoutersStanford Stroke Center, Palo Alto, CA (P.S., A.W., N.Y., M.M., S.K., S.C., M.G.L., G.W.A.).ORCID 0000-0001-5229-2699
Adrien Ter SchiphorstNeurology Department (A.T.S., C.A.), CHRU Gui de Chauliac, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7354-3351
Nicole YuenStanford Stroke Center, Palo Alto, CA (P.S., A.W., N.Y., M.M., S.K., S.C., M.G.L., G.W.A.).ORCID 0000-0003-3206-6656
Michael MlynashStanford Stroke Center, Palo Alto, CA (P.S., A.W., N.Y., M.M., S.K., S.C., M.G.L., G.W.A.).ORCID 0000-0001-7483-8699
Caroline ArquizanInstitut de Psychiatrie et Neurosciences de Paris, U1266, INSERM, Paris, France (P.S., C.A.).ORCID 0000-0001-7347-1039
Jeremy J HeitRadiology Department, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA (J.J.H.).
Stephanie KempStanford Stroke Center, Palo Alto, CA (P.S., A.W., N.Y., M.M., S.K., S.C., M.G.L., G.W.A.).
Soren ChristensenStanford Stroke Center, Palo Alto, CA (P.S., A.W., N.Y., M.M., S.K., S.C., M.G.L., G.W.A.).ORCID 0000-0003-1242-3724
Denis SablotNeurology Department, CH Perpignan, Perpignan, France (D.S.).ORCID 0000-0002-9038-7119
Anne WacongneNeurology Department, CHU Nimes, France (A.W.).ORCID 0000-0002-3976-3772
Thibault LaluNeurology Department, CH Béziers, France (T.L.).
Vincent CostalatNeuroradiology Department (V.C.), CHRU Gui de Chauliac, Montpellier, France.
Maarten G LansbergStanford Stroke Center, Palo Alto, CA (P.S., A.W., N.Y., M.M., S.K., S.C., M.G.L., G.W.A.).
Gregory W AlbersStanford Stroke Center, Palo Alto, CA (P.S., A.W., N.Y., M.M., S.K., S.C., M.G.L., G.W.A.).ORCID 0000-0003-0263-4632

Funding

CTP to predict Response to recanalization in Ischemic Stroke Project (CRISP)R01NS075209 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LANSBERG, MAARTEN G · 2011 to 2023
$6.0M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS075209
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with acute ischemic stroke harboring a large vessel occlusion admitted to nonendovascular-capable centers often require interhospital transfer for thrombectomy. We evaluated the incidence and predictors of arterial recanalization during transfer, as well as the relationship between interhospital recanalization and clinical outcomes.

methodsWe analyzed data from 2 cohorts of patients with an anterior circulation large vessel occlusion transferred for consideration of thrombectomy to a comprehensive center, with arterial imaging at the referring hospital and on comprehensive stroke center arrival. Interhospital recanalization was determined by comparison of the baseline and posttransfer arterial imaging and was defined as revised arterial occlusive lesion (rAOL) score 2b to 3. Pretransfer variables independently associated with interhospital recanalization were studied using multivariable logistic regression analysis.

resultsOf the 520 included patients (Montpellier, France, n=237; Stanford, United States, n=283), 111 (21%) experienced interhospital recanalization (partial [rAOL=2b] in 77% and complete [rAOL=3] in 23%). Pretransfer variables independently associated with recanalization were intravenous thrombolysis (adjusted odds ratio, 6.8 [95% CI, 4.0-11.6]), more distal occlusions (intracranial carotid occlusion as reference: adjusted odds ratio, 2.0 [95% CI, 0.9-4.5] for proximal first segment of the middle cerebral artery, 5.1 [95% CI, 2.3-11.5] for distal first segment of the middle cerebral artery, and 5.0 [95% CI, 2.1-11.8] for second segment of the middle cerebral artery), and smaller clot burden (clot burden score 0-4 as reference: adjusted odds ratio, 3.4 [95% CI, 1.5-7.6] for 5-7 and 5.6 [95% CI, 2.4-12.7] for 8-9). Recanalization on arrival at the comprehensive center was associated with less interhospital infarct growth (rAOL, 0-2a: 11.6 mL; rAOL, 2b: 2.2 mL; rAOL, 3: 0.6 mL;

conclusionsRecanalization is frequently observed during interhospital transfer for thrombectomy and is strongly associated with favorable outcomes, even when partial. Broadening thrombolysis indications in primary centers, and developing therapies that increase recanalization during transfer, will likely improve clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Ischemic StrokePatient TransferThrombectomyAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment Outcomeendovascular proceduresincidenceinfarctionischemic strokethrombolytic therapy

Identifiers

PMID38752736
PMCPMC11338625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.