Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38752654›Full record

SynthesisThe American journal of gastroenterology2024

Machine Learning Models for Pancreatic Cancer Risk Prediction Using Electronic Health Record Data-A Systematic Review and Assessment.

Anup Kumar Mishra, Bradford Chong, Shivaram P Arunachalam, Ann L Oberg, Shounak Majumder

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anup Kumar MishraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8489-0087
Bradford ChongDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4973-3902
Shivaram P ArunachalamDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Ann L ObergDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2539-9807
Shounak MajumderDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

Mayo Clinic Prospective Resource for Biomarker Validation and Early Detection of Pancreatic CancerU01CA210138 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Shounak Majumder, Kenneth Zaret · 2016 to 2026
$9.0M
Management and Data Coordination Unit for PCDCU24CA274496 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Ann Laura Oberg · 2022 to 2026
$3.3M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA210138NCI NIH HHS U01CA210138NCI NIH HHS U24 CA274496NCI NIH HHS U24CA274496
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAccurate risk prediction can facilitate screening and early detection of pancreatic cancer (PC). We conducted a systematic review to critically evaluate effectiveness of machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) techniques applied to electronic health records (EHR) for PC risk prediction.

methodsOvid MEDLINE(R), Ovid EMBASE, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for articles that utilized ML/AI techniques to predict PC, published between January 1, 2012, and February 1, 2024. Study selection and data extraction were conducted by 2 independent reviewers. Critical appraisal and data extraction were performed using the CHecklist for critical Appraisal and data extraction for systematic Reviews of prediction Modelling Studies checklist. Risk of bias and applicability were examined using prediction model risk of bias assessment tool.

resultsThirty studies including 169,149 PC cases were identified. Logistic regression was the most frequent modeling method. Twenty studies utilized a curated set of known PC risk predictors or those identified by clinical experts. ML model discrimination performance (C-index) ranged from 0.57 to 1.0. Missing data were underreported, and most studies did not implement explainable-AI techniques or report exclusion time intervals. DISCUSSION: AI/ML models for PC risk prediction using known risk factors perform reasonably well and may have near-term applications in identifying cohorts for targeted PC screening if validated in real-world data sets. The combined use of structured and unstructured EHR data using emerging AI models while incorporating explainable-AI techniques has the potential to identify novel PC risk factors, and this approach merits further study.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsMachine LearningPancreatic NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerHumansRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID38752654
PMCPMC11296923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.