Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38752651›Full record

ReviewIntegrated environmental assessment and management2024

Considerations and challenges in support of science and communication of fish consumption advisories for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances.

Jonathan Michael Petali, Erin L Pulster, Christopher McCarthy, Heidi M Pickard, Elsie M Sunderland, Jacqueline Bangma, Courtney C Carignan, Anna Robuck, Kathryn A Crawford, Megan E Romano and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Integrated environmental assessment and management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jonathan Michael PetaliEnvironmental Health Program, New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services, Concord, New Hampshire, USA.
Erin L PulsterUS Geological Survey, Columbia Environmental Research Center, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Christopher McCarthyJacobs Engineering, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5587-8203
Heidi M PickardHarvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Elsie M SunderlandHarvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Jacqueline BangmaOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.
Courtney C CarignanDepartment Food Science and Human Nutrition, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Anna RobuckEnvironmental Effects Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Narragansett, Rhode Island, USA.
Kathryn A CrawfordEnvironmental Studies Programs, Middlebury College, Middlebury, Vermont, USA.
Megan E RomanoDepartment of Epidemiology, The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA.
Rainer LohmannGraduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island, Narragansett, Rhode Island, USA.
Katherine von StackelburgDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Sources, Transport, Exposure & Effects of PFAS (STEEP) Center - RENEWALP42ES027706 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND · PI Rainer Lohmann · 2017 to 2026
$18.9M
Assessment of pediatric immunotoxicity, public education, and capacity-building in communities impacted by PFAS-contaminated drinking waterR01ES028311 · NIEHS · SILENT SPRING INSTITUTE · PI BROWN, PHILIP M., SCHAIDER, LAUREL A. · 2018 to 2022
$2.6M
Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in Marine Fish and Shellfish: A biomonitoring tool for PFAS remediation and a metric for potential human exposure through seafood consumptionR21ES032187 · NIEHS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI CHEN, CELIA Y, ROMANO, MEGAN E · 2020 to 2021
$434k
National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) Superfund Research Program P42ES027706NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES027706NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES028311NIEHS NIH HHS R01ES028311NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES032187NIEHS NIH HHS R21ES032187USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch project MICL02565USEPA National Priorities Program 839482
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Federal, state, tribal, or local entities in the United States issue fish consumption advisories (FCAs) as guidance for safer consumption of locally caught fish containing contaminants. Fish consumption advisories have been developed for commonly detected compounds such as mercury and polychlorinated biphenyls. The existing national guidance does not specifically address the unique challenges associated with bioaccumulation and consumption risk related to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). As a result, several states have derived their own PFAS-related consumption guidelines, many of which focus on one frequently detected PFAS, known as perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS). However, there can be significant variation between tissue concentrations or trigger concentrations (TCs) of PFOS that support the individual state-issued FCAs. This variation in TCs can create challenges for risk assessors and risk communicators in their efforts to protect public health. The objective of this article is to review existing challenges, knowledge gaps, and needs related to issuing PFAS-related FCAs and to provide key considerations for the development of protective fish consumption guidance. The current state of the science and variability in FCA derivation, considerations for sampling and analytical methodologies, risk management, risk communication, and policy challenges are discussed. How to best address PFAS mixtures in the development of FCAs, in risk assessment, and establishment of effect thresholds remains a major challenge, as well as a source of uncertainty and scrutiny. This includes developments better elucidating toxicity factors, exposures to PFAS mixtures, community fish consumption behaviors, and evolving technology and analytical instrumentation, methods, and the associated detection limits. Given the evolving science and public interests informing PFAS-related FCAs, continued review and revision of FCA approaches and best practices are vital. Nonetheless, consistent, widely applicable, PFAS-specific approaches informing methods, critical concentration thresholds, and priority compounds may assist practitioners in PFAS-related FCA development and possibly reduce variability between states and jurisdictions. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2024;20:1839-1858. © 2024 The Author(s). Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).

Indexed as

FishesFluorocarbonsFood ContaminationWater Pollutants, ChemicalAlkanesulfonic AcidsAnimalsEnvironmental MonitoringHumansRisk AssessmentSeafoodUnited StatesAlkanesulfonic AcidsFluorocarbonsperfluorooctane sulfonic acidWater Pollutants, ChemicalFish consumption advisoriesFish samplingPFASRisk assessmentRisk communication

Identifiers

PMID38752651
PMCPMC11486601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.