Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38752596›Full record

ArticleBiology open2024

Foraging behaviour and habitat use during chick-rearing in the Australian endemic black-faced cormorant (Phalacrocorax fuscescens).

Thomas Cansse, Luc Lens, Grace J Sutton, Jonathan A Botha, John P Y Arnould

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thomas CansseSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood 3125, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1430-7153
Luc LensTerrestrial Ecology Unit, Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0241-2215
Grace J SuttonSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood 3125, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9798-0281
Jonathan A BothaSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood 3125, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9935-5607
John P Y ArnouldSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood 3125, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1124-9330

Funding

Deakin University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite its wide distribution, relatively little is known of the foraging ecology and habitat use of the black-faced cormorant (Phalacrocorax fuscescens), an Australian endemic seabird. Such information is urgently required in view of the rapid oceanic warming of south-eastern Australia, the stronghold of the species. The present study used a combination of opportunistically collected regurgitates and GPS/dive behaviour data loggers to investigate diet, foraging behaviour and habitat-use of black-faced cormorants during four chick-rearing periods (2020-2023) on Notch Island, northern Bass Strait. Observed prey species were almost exclusively benthic (95%), which is consistent with the predominantly benthic diving behaviour recorded. Males foraged at deeper depths than females (median depth males: 18 m; median depth females: 8 m), presumably due to a greater physiological diving capacity derived from their larger body size. This difference in dive depths was associated with sexual segregation of foraging locations, with females predominantly frequenting shallower areas closer to the coastline. These findings have strong implications for the management of the species, as impacts of environmental change may disproportionally affect the foraging range of one sex and, thereby, reproductive success.

Indexed as

BirdsEcosystemFeeding BehaviorAnimalsAustraliaFemaleMaleBass StraitCormorantDietForaging behaviourHabitat useSeabird

Identifiers

PMID38752596
PMCPMC11128270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.