ArticleVeterinary and comparative oncology2024
Immunohistochemical and transcriptomic characterization of T and myeloid cell infiltrates in canine malignant melanoma.
Article in Veterinary and comparative oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- PD-L1, PD-1, and CTLA-4 mRNA In Situ Expression by Canine Oral Melanoma Cells and Immune Cells of the Tumour Microenvironment.Veterinary and comparative oncology · 2025Article
- Preclinical Evaluation of an Anchored Immunotherapy Strategy with Aluminum Hydroxide-Tethered IL-12 in Dogs with Advanced Malignant Melanoma.Molecular cancer therapeutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy can provide significant clinical benefit in patients with certain cancer types including melanoma; however, objective responses are only observed for a subset of patients. Mucosal melanoma is a rare melanoma subtype associated with a poor prognosis and, compared with cutaneous melanoma, is significantly less responsive to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Spontaneous canine tumours have emerged as valuable models to inform human cancer studies. In contrast to human melanoma, most canine melanomas are mucosal-an incidence that may be leveraged to better understand the subtype in humans. However, a more comprehensive understanding of the immune landscape of the canine disease is required. Here, we quantify tumour infiltrative T and myeloid cells in canine mucosal (n = 13) and cutaneous (n = 5) melanomas using immunohistochemical analysis of CD3 and MAC387 expression, respectively. Gene expression analysis using the Canine IO NanoString panel was also performed to identify genes and pathways associated with immune cell infiltration. T and myeloid cell densities were variable with geometric means of 158.7 cells/mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.