ArticleCancer medicine2024
Cardiovascular adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A retrospective multicenter cohort study.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated Cardiovascular Toxicity: Mechanisms, Clinical Manifestations, and Clinical Impact.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2026Review
- Advancing precision cardio-oncology: multimodal surveillance and stratified management of immunotherapy-induced cardiovascular toxicity.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Peripheral blood cells and immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis: a retrospective clinical study with pharmacovigilance and single-cell analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Review
- The Role of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer Therapy: Mechanism and Therapeutic Advances.MedComm · 2025Review
- Article
- Predictive factors and outcomes of immune-related adverse events in Chinese patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a real-world retrospective study.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Association between immune checkpoint inhibitors and cardiovascular risks: a nationwide self-controlled case series study.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
- Oncolytic Virus Therapy in a New Era of Immunotherapy, Enhanced by Combination with Existing Anticancer Therapies: Turn up the Heat!Journal of Cancer · 2025Review
- The Good (Tumor Killing) and the Bad (Cardiovascular Complications) of Immunologic Checkpoint Inhibitors.Current cardiology reports · 2024Review
- Myocarditis, Myositis, and Myasthenia Gravis Overlap Syndrome Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Cardiovascular adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A retrospective multicenter cohort study.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced myocarditis: a comprehensive review with clinical case insights.Archivos peruanos de cardiologia y cirugia cardiovascularArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOver the past decade, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly transformed cancer treatment. However, ICIs inevitably may cause a spectrum of immune-related adverse events, among which cardiovascular toxicity, particularly myocarditis, while infrequent, has garnered increasing attention due to its high fatality rate.
methodsWe conducted a multicenter retrospective study to characterize ICI-associated cardiovascular adverse events. Logistic regression was performed to explore the risk factors for the development of myocarditis and severe myocarditis. Receiver operating characteristic curves were conducted to assess the diagnostic abilities of cardiac biomarkers to distinguish different cardiovascular toxicities, and the performance and calibration were evaluated using Hosmer-Lemeshow test.
resultsForty-four patients were identified, including thirty-five myocarditis, five heart failure, three arrhythmias, and one myocardial infarction. Compared with other patients, myocarditis patients had higher cardiac troponin-I (cTnI) levels (p < 0.001), higher creatine kinase levels (p = 0.003), higher creatine kinase isoenzyme-MB (CK-MB) levels (p = 0.013), and shorter time to the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events (p = 0.022) after ICI treatment. Twenty-one patients (60%) were classified as severe myocarditis, and they presented higher cardiac troponin I (cTnI) levels (p = 0.013), higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels (p = 0.031), higher creatine kinase levels (p = 0.018), higher CK-MB levels (p = 0.026), and higher neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) levels (p = 0.016) compared to non-severe myocarditis patients after ICI treatment. Multivariate logistic regression showed that CK-MB (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 1.775, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.055-2.984, p = 0.031) was the independent risk factor of the development of ICI-associated myocarditis, and cTnI (adjusted OR: 1.021, 95% CI: 1.002-1.039, p = 0.03) and NLR (adjusted OR: 1.890, 95% CI: 1.026-3.483, p = 0.041) were the independent risk factors of ICI-associated severe myocarditis. The receiver operating characteristic curve showed an area under curve of 0.785 (95% CI: 0.642 to 0.928, p = 0.013) for CK-MB, 0.765 (95% CI: 0.601 to 0.929, p = 0.013) for cTnI, and 0.773 for NLR (95% CI: 0.597 to 0.948, p = 0.016).
conclusionsElevated CK-MB after ICI treatment is the independent risk factor for the incidence of ICI-associated myocarditis, and elevated cTnI and NLR after ICI treatment are the independent risk factors for the development of ICI-associated severe myocarditis. CK-MB, cTnI, and NLR demonstrated a promising predictive utility for the identification of ICI-associated myocarditis and severe myocarditis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.