Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38752421›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine

ACVIM consensus statement on the diagnosis of immune thrombocytopenia in dogs and cats.

Dana N LeVine, Linda Kidd, Oliver A Garden, Marjory B Brooks, Robert Goggs, Barbara Kohn, Andrew J Mackin, Erin R B Eldermire, Yu-Mei Chang, Julie Allen and 16 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Septic Shock and Prognosis in Dogs and Cats With Sepsis-Consensus Definition and Clinical Criteria.Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)
    Pooled it
  3. Sepsis in Dogs and Cats-Consensus Definition and Clinical Criteria.Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia in a dog: Diagnostic challenges and therapeutic considerations.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Dana N LeVineDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1089-5640
Linda KiddWestern University of Health Sciences College of Veterinary Medicine, Pomona, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2464-0796
Oliver A GardenSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4133-9487
Marjory B BrooksDepartment of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5489-9013
Robert GoggsDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7446-6987
Barbara KohnClinic for Small Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Andrew J MackinCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, Starkville, Mississippi, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8465-0198
Erin R B EldermireFlower-Sprecher Veterinary Library, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Yu-Mei ChangDepartment of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6388-9626
Julie AllenVeterinary Information Network, Davis, California, USA.
Peter W ChristophersonDepartment of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA.
Barbara GlanemannDepartment of Clinical Science and Services, Royal Veterinary College, University of London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4830-7610
Haruhiko MaruyamaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, College of Bioresource Sciences, Nihon University, Chiyoda City, Japan.
Maria C NaskouDepartment of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9255-7794
Lise N NielsenDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3988-0979
Sarah ShropshireCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Austin K ViallDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Adam J BirkenheuerCollege of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2617-2252
Marnin A FormanCornell University Veterinary Specialists, Stamford, Connecticut, USA.
Andrew S HanzlicekMiraVista Veterinary Diagnostics, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6523-4033
Kathrin F LangnerWestern Australian Veterinary Emergency and Specialty, Perth, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5058-7140
Erin LashnitsSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0949-5698
Katharine F LunnAxiom Veterinary Laboratories, Newton Abbot, Devon, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7083-5861
Kelly M MakielskiCollege of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St Paul, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7878-2370
Xavier RouraHospital Clinic Veterinari, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.
Eva SpadaVeterinary Transfusion Research Laboratory (REVLab), Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, University of Milan, Lodi, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3898-6955

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001873 · NCATS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI REILLY, MUREDACH P · 2016 to 2025
$99.0M
Disparities in COVID Disease Severity and Outcomes in New York CityUL1TR002384 · NCATS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI JULIANNE L IMPERATO-MCGINLEY · 2017 to 2026
$86.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001873NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002384
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is the most common acquired primary hemostatic disorder in dogs. Immune thrombocytopenia less commonly affects cats but is an important cause of mortality and treatment-associated morbidity in both species. Immune thrombocytopenia remains a diagnosis of exclusion for which diagnostic guidelines are lacking. Primary, or non-associative, ITP refers to autoimmune platelet destruction. Secondary, or associative, ITP arises in response to an underlying disease trigger. However, evidence for which comorbidities serve as ITP triggers has not been systematically evaluated. To identify key diagnostic steps for ITP and important comorbidities associated with secondary ITP, we developed 12 Population Evaluation/Exposure Comparison Outcome (PECO) format questions. These questions were addressed by evidence evaluators utilizing a literature pool of 287 articles identified by the panelists using a structured search strategy. Evidence evaluators, using panel-designed templates and data extraction tools, summarized evidence and created guideline recommendations that then were integrated by diagnosis and comorbidity domain chairs. The revised PECO responses underwent a Delphi survey process to reach consensus on final guidelines. A combination of panel expertise and PECO responses were employed to develop algorithms for diagnosis of ITP in dogs and cats, which also underwent 4 iterations of Delphi review. Comorbidity evidence evaluators employed an integrated measure of evidence (IME) tool to determine evidence quality for each comorbidity; IME values combined with evidence summaries for each comorbidity were integrated to develop ITP screening recommendations, which also were subjected to Delphi review. Commentary was solicited from multiple relevant professional organizations before finalizing the consensus. The final consensus statement provides clinical guidelines for the diagnosis of, and underlying disease screening for, ITP in dogs and cats. The systematic consensus process identified numerous knowledge gaps that should guide future studies. This statement is a companion manuscript to the ACVIM Consensus Statement on the Treatment of Immune Thrombocytopenia.

Indexed as

Cat DiseasesDog DiseasesPurpura, Thrombocytopenic, IdiopathicAnimalsCatsDogsautoimmunehemostasisimmune‐mediatedplateletthrombopoietin

Identifiers

PMID38752421
PMCPMC11256148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.