ReviewFrontiers in chemistry2024
Application and progress of new technologies and new materials in the treatment of pathological scar.
Review in Frontiers in chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Efficacy of High-Frequency Ultrasound Precision Monitoring Ring Drilling in the Treatment of Pathologic Scarring.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Trial
- MFAP4 Promotes Scar Formation by Regulating Macrophage-Myofibroblast Transformation Through Activation of the TGF-β/Smad3 Signalling Pathway.Experimental dermatology · 2026Article
- Research advances in the pathogenesis and photodynamic therapy of pathological scars.Lasers in medical science · 2026Review
- Optimal Mechanical Stretch Promotes TSP-1 Expression Through Akt and GSK-3β/β-Catenin Signaling Pathways in Keloid Formation.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Leveraging Microneedles for Raised Scar Management.Polymers · 2025Review
- Research progress of dissolving microneedles in the field of component administration of traditional Chinese medicine.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- High-powered 675-nm laser: Safety and efficacy in clinical evaluation and in vitro evidence for different skin disorders.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pathological scars (PS), including hypertrophic scars (HTS) and keloids, are a common complication of poor wound healing that significantly affects patients' quality of life. Currently, there are several treatment options for PS, including surgery, drug therapy, radiation therapy, and biological therapy. However, these treatments still face major challenges such as low efficacy, high side effects, and a high risk of recurrence. Therefore, the search for safer and more effective treatments is particularly urgent. New materials often have less immune rejection, good histocompatibility, and can reduce secondary damage during treatment. New technology can also reduce the side effects of traditional treatments and the recurrence rate after treatment. Furthermore, derivative products of new materials and biomaterials can improve the therapeutic effect of new technologies on PS. Therefore, new technologies and innovative materials are considered better options for enhancing PS. This review concentrates on the use of two emerging technologies, microneedle (MN) and photodynamic therapy (PDT), and two novel materials, photosensitizers and exosomes (Exos), in the treatment of PS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.