Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38752192›Full record

ArticleStrategies in trauma and limb reconstruction

Clinical Outcome following Management of Severe Osteomyelitis due to Pin Site Infection.

Florian A Frank, Eoghan Pomeroy, Andrew J Hotchen, David Stubbs, Jamie Y Ferguson, Martin McNally

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Strategies in trauma and limb reconstruction. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Florian A FrankBone Infection Unit, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, United Kingdom; Musculoskeletal Infections Centre (ZMSI), Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland.
Eoghan PomeroyBone Infection Unit, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Andrew J HotchenBone Infection Unit, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, United Kingdom.
David StubbsBone Infection Unit, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Jamie Y FergusonBone Infection Unit, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Martin McNallyBone Infection Unit, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: This study has investigated cases of pin site infection (PSI) which required surgery for persistent osteomyelitis (OM) despite pin removal. Materials and methods: Patients requiring surgery for OM after PSI between 2011 and 2021 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Single-stage surgery was performed in accordance with a protocol at one institution. This involved deep sampling, debridement, implantation of local antibiotics, culture-specific systemic antibiotics and soft tissue closure. A successful outcome was defined as an infection-free interval of at least 24 months following surgery. Results: Twenty-seven patients were identified (the sites were 22 tibias, 2 humeri, 2 calcanei, 1 radius); about 85% of them were males with a median age of 53.9 years. The majority of infections (21/27) followed fracture treatment. Fifteen patients were classified as BACH uncomplicated and 12 were BACH complex. Conclusion: Osteomyelitis after PSI is uncommon but has major implications for the patient as 7 patients needed flap coverage. This reinforces the need for careful pin placement and pin site care to prevent deep infection. These infections were treated in accordance with a protocol and were not managed simply by curettage. All patients treated in this manner remained infection-free after a minimum follow-up of 2 years suggesting that this protocol is effective. Clinical significance: Pin site infection is a very common complication in external fixation. The sequela of a chronic pin site OM is rare but the implications to the patient are huge. In this series, more than a quarter of patients required flap coverage as part of the treatment of the deep infection. How to cite this article: Frank FA, Pomeroy E, Hotchen AJ,

Indexed as

Local antibioticsOne-stage surgeryOsteomyelitisPin site infectionRetrospective cohort study

Identifiers

PMID38752192
PMCPMC11091898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.