ArticleCureus2024
Emergency Department Utilization by Pediatric Patients With Sickle Cell Disease in Basrah, Iraq.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) often present in the Emergency Department (ED) with acute and debilitating pain and other SCD-related complications. Objectives The objective is to analyze the causes of ED visits of pediatric patients with SCD, assess the burden of ED admission due to SCD in relation to other pediatric diseases, the treatment given, and the outcomes. Methods A prospective analytical study was conducted on children and adolescents with SCD, 1-14 years old who had been admitted to the ED at Basrah Maternity and Children Hospital over a six-month period. Patient's sociodemographic and clinical data, drug history, length of ED stay, complications, outcome, and readmissions were recorded. Results A total of 422 patients with SCD were admitted to ED during the study period representing 4.10% of the total admitted cases; 276(65.40%) of them were recruited in this study, and their mean age was 7.84 ±3.47 years. The main cause for ED admission was pain (73.91%), followed by infection (10.14%) and hemolytic crisis (6.15%). The mean duration of stay at ED was 6.11±1.87 hours. All admitted SCD patients had received analgesia; non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were the commonest (80.4%), followed by acetaminophen (39.5%), and opioid narcotic (18.5%). Readmission within 30-days was reported in 82(29.71%) patients and was associated with the number of ED visits/last year (B=0.151, P=0.023), length of stay at ED (B=0.140, P=0.034) and severe disease (B=0.253, P<0.001). Conclusions Acute painful episodes were the main cause of ED admission. Although most patients with pain did receive NSAIDs, only a small percentage of them did receive opioids. About one-third of patients have been readmitted within 30 days, and readmission was associated with the number of ED visits/last year, disease severity, and length of ED stay. These findings can help in establishing local guidelines for managing such patients in the ED especially pain management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.