ArticleCureus2024
A Study of the Demographic Profile, Screening, and Management of Patients Visiting a Retinopathy of Prematurity Clinic.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a retinal vasoproliferative disease affecting premature infants. Despite improvements in neonatal care and management, ROP still remains a major cause of childhood blindness worldwide. Studying the demographic profile and screening is essential to develop predictive models, to gain insights into the cause of retinal vascular diseases and diseases of prematurity, and to determine the future management and research in ROP. The objective of the present study was to estimate the incidence of ROP, to identify the risk factors that predispose to ROP, and to assess the outcome of these cases. Hence, this study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital in Maharashtra. Method A prospective, observational study was conducted from 10 August 2022 to 10 October 2022. Infants with gestational ages < 34 weeks, birth weights < 2000 g, infants who received supplemental oxygen therapy, or patients who required NICU stay were screened for ROP. Demographic details were recorded to assess the risk factors and treatment was given according to the severity of ROP grade. Result A total of 160 eyes of 80 infants were screened and analysed. The overall incidence of "any ROP" was 19 patients (38 eyes), i.e., 24%. Out of 80 patients, six were of 28 weeks gestational age, of whom four (67%) were positive for ROP. The mean birth weight of infants with ROP was 1331.58 ± 238.532 g (p < 0.0001). ROP stage 1 was seen in five patients (26.32%), stage 2 in 10 patients (52.63%), and stage 3 in four patients (21.0%), with no subjects in stages 4 & 5. Out of 19 patients, six (32%) had type 1 ROP, and 13 (68%) had type 2 ROP. Out of 19 cases, 13 (68%) received follow-up care based on the severity of their disease, and six (32%) were treated with panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) laser. Conclusion Incidence of any ROP was 24%. Prematurity, low birth weight, and oxygen therapy remain the most significant risk factors associated with the development of ROP. Early referral, diagnosis, and timely intervention will play a monumental role in improving the prognosis of this potentially blinding disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.