Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38752063›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Comparative Assessment of Gingival Depigmentation Using Scalpel Versus Microneedling With Ascorbic Acid: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Swarna Meenakshi P, Subasree S

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07070024 phase1 / phase2not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of Microneedling With Vitamin C in Performing Gingival Depigmentation Compared With Conventional Scalpel and Diode Laser: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorFayoum UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled30ConditionsGingival PigmentationArmsVitamin C, Microneedling, Diode laser, scalpal
NCT07410156 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Evaluation of Microneedling Technique With Topical Application of Silymarin on Gingival Hyperpigmentation in Comparison With Diode Laser and Scalpel Methods. A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorFayoum UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled30ConditionsGingival Pigmentation, Gingival HyperpigmentaionArmsGingival Depigmentation with Conventional Method, Gingival Depigmentation with Diode Laser, Gingival Depigmentation with Microneedling and Silymarin Application
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. How Effective Is Vitamin C for Gingival Depigmentation? A Scoping Review.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Swarna Meenakshi PPeriodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.
Subasree SPeriodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Gingival pigmentation (GP), characterized by the presence of melanin in the gingival tissues, is a common aesthetic concern in dental practice. While it poses no inherent health risks, the visible discoloration may cause psychological distress for individuals seeking optimal dental aesthetics. Understanding the efficacy of various methods is essential for refining treatment strategies and enhancing patient satisfaction in the realm of gingival depigmentation (GD). Aim The objective of the study was to compare the effectiveness of scalpel and microneedling (MN) with ascorbic acid in the treatment of GD. Materials and methods Sixteen patients who had a complaint of GP were included in the study, of whom eight were allocated for depigmentation with a scalpel, and the other eight patients were treated with the MN technique with ascorbic acid. Postoperative wound healing scores were evaluated on the first and seventh days, respectively. The intensity of depigmentation was assessed at baseline, in the first month, and at the end of the third month, respectively. Results The mean Dummett-Gupta Oral Pigmentation Index (DOPI) score at baseline was 2.65±0.16 and 2.61±0.17 in the surgical and microneedling groups with ascorbic acid, respectively. The mean DOPI score at the end of the third month was 1.67±0.39 and 0.87±0.17 in the scalpel and MN with ascorbic acid groups, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the scalpel and MN with ascorbic acid groups at the end of the first and third months, respectively, where MN with ascorbic acid showed aesthetically pleasing outcomes. Patients treated with the scalpel technique showed incomplete healing and ulceration on the first and seventh days after the procedure when compared to the MN technique with ascorbic acid. The healing index scores were statistically significant in the MN with ascorbic acid group. Conclusion The MN technique with ascorbic acid is a successful technique for treating GD. It showed aesthetically gratifying outcomes when compared to the conventional surgical technique.

Indexed as

conventional scalpel techniquegingival depigmentationl-ascorbic acidmicroneedling­wound healing

Identifiers

PMID38752063
PMCPMC11094566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.