ArticleCureus2024
Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Minimum Data Set: Towards Standardization of Data Elements in History and Physical Examination.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionNonoperative care represents a cornerstone of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) management, although no consensus exists for a minimal data set. We aimed to determine a consensus in critical data points to obtain during clinical AIS visits.
methodsA REDCap-based survey was distributed to Pediatric Orthopedic Society of America (POSNA), Pediatric Spine Study Group (PSSG), and International Society on Scoliosis Orthopedic and Rehabilitation Treatment (SOSORT). Respondents ranked the importance of data points in history, physical examination, and bracing during AIS visits. Results: One hundred eighty-one responses were received (26% response rate), of which 86% were physicians and 14% were allied health professionals. About 80% of respondents worked at pediatric hospitals or pediatric spaces within adult hospitals, and 82% were academic, with the majority (57%) seeing 150+ unique AIS patients annually. Most respondents recommended six-month follow-up for patients under observation (60%) and bracing (54%). Most respondents (75%) considered family history and pain important (69%), with the majority (69%) asking about pain at every visit. Across all time points, Adam's forward bend test, shoulder level, sagittal contour, trunk shift, and curve stiffness were all considered critically important (>60%). At the first visit, scapular prominence, leg lengths, motor and neurological examination, gait, and iliac crest height were also viewed as critical. At the preoperative visit, motor strength and scapular prominence should also be documented. About 39% of respondents use heat sensors to monitor bracing compliance, and average brace wear since the prior visit was considered the most important (85%) compliance data point.
conclusionsThis study establishes recommendations for a 19-item minimum data set for clinical AIS evaluation, including history, physical exam, and bracing, to allow for future multicenter registry-based studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.