ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024
Wearable sensor devices can automatically identify the ON-OFF status of patients with Parkinson's disease through an interpretable machine learning model.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Explainable artificial intelligence for gait analysis: advances, pitfalls, and challenges - a systematic review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Pooled it
- Detection of early-stage Parkinson's disease using wearable sensors at multiple body locations and convolutional neural networks.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- AI-Enabled Flexible Sensing Ecosystems for Parkinson's Disease: Advancing Digital Biomarkers and Closed-Loop Interventions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Digital Technologies for Symptom Monitoring in Parkinson Disease.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026Review
- AI-Enabled Wearables for Motor Function Assessment and Rehabilitation in Parkinson Disease: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Review
- Toward future diagnostics of Parkinson's disease: a perspective on multimodal motor assessment and personalized digital twins.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Exploring Age-Related Patterns in Smartphone Keystroke Dynamics Considering Temporal Variability: Cross-Sectional Study With AI-Based Analysis.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2025Article
- Systematic review of wearables assessing medication effect on motor function and symptoms in Parkinson's disease.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2025Article
- Discrimination of the Lame Limb in Horses Using a Machine Learning Method (Support Vector Machine) Based on Asymmetry Indices Measured by the EQUISYM System.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Towards Transforming Neurorehabilitation: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Diagnosis and Treatment of Neurological Disorders.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Simplification of Mobility Tests and Data Processing to Increase Applicability of Wearable Sensors as Diagnostic Tools for Parkinson's Disease.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- L-Dopa/Carbidopa intestinal gel infusion in advanced Parkinson's disease: real-life mobility insights from wearable sensors.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Accurately and objectively quantifying the clinical features of Parkinson's disease (PD) is crucial for assisting in diagnosis and guiding the formulation of treatment plans. Therefore, based on the data on multi-site motor features, this study aimed to develop an interpretable machine learning (ML) model for classifying the "OFF" and "ON" status of patients with PD, as well as to explore the motor features that are most associated with changes in clinical symptoms. Methods: We employed a support vector machine with a recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE) algorithm to select promising motion features. Subsequently, 12 ML models were constructed based on these features, and we identified the model with the best classification performance. Then, we used the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and the Local Interpretable Model agnostic Explanations (LIME) methods to explain the model and rank the importance of those motor features. Results: A total of 96 patients were finally included in this study. The naive Bayes (NB) model had the highest classification performance (AUC = 0.956; sensitivity = 0.8947, 95% CI 0.6686-0.9870; accuracy = 0.8421, 95% CI 0.6875-0.9398). Based on the NB model, we analyzed the importance of eight motor features toward the classification results using the SHAP algorithm. The Gait: range of motion (RoM) Shank left (L) (degrees) [Mean] might be the most important motor feature for all classification horizons. Conclusion: The symptoms of PD could be objectively quantified. By utilizing suitable motor features to construct ML models, it became possible to intelligently identify whether patients with PD were in the "ON" or "OFF" status. The variations in these motor features were significantly correlated with improvement rates in patients' quality of life. In the future, they might act as objective digital biomarkers to elucidate the changes in symptoms observed in patients with PD and might be used to assist in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with PD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.